@Judges threaten America - Mike
Congress is still 175 House RINOS and 48 whores in Senate. Enemies of the people.
Relays (1)
- wss://relay.ditto.pub – read & write
Recent Notes
Let me get this straight
> the silent filibuster isn't in the Constitution, it's literally just made up procedure
> it allows a 40-senator minority to block one of the most important and overwhelmin...
@nprofile1q...
Those GOP senators are happy the way things are.
They're not interested in the people choosing their leaders.
"Why leave it to chance?"
~thinks every selected politician
Those GOP senators are happy the way things are.
They're not interested in the people choosing their leaders.
"Why leave it to chance?"
~thinks every selected politician
@nprofile1q...
Honestly, that long-standing determination may have played right into Netanyahu's Greater Israel plan.
@nprofile1q...
Honestly, that long-standing determination may have played right into Netanyahu's Greater Israel plan.
@nprofile1q...
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqxd3kd9vvvudk2qzcnqjr9w0x878vf9qwju3mwu3w2m40tasz986qu5gzxs Are you talking about Iran? If so, that's not what I am hearing from the Iranians I kn...
@nprofile1q...
We've been firehosed with reasons for decades to fight wars.
But is that why Netanyahu forced us into this war right now?
WMD in Iraq? No. But our response to 19 Saudi terrorists on 9/11 was war w/ Iraq.
Hillary gave arms to Al-Qaeda to get Gaddafi. He wanted a gold-backed currency
Who remembers why 20 years in Afghanistan happened? We lost
We started the Ukraine War in 2014
Are we now Iranian People First? No
Nukes in Iran? Well, no. But Iran was ready to attack Israel. WAR!
We've been firehosed with reasons for decades to fight wars.
But is that why Netanyahu forced us into this war right now?
WMD in Iraq? No. But our response to 19 Saudi terrorists on 9/11 was war w/ Iraq.
Hillary gave arms to Al-Qaeda to get Gaddafi. He wanted a gold-backed currency
Who remembers why 20 years in Afghanistan happened? We lost
We started the Ukraine War in 2014
Are we now Iranian People First? No
Nukes in Iran? Well, no. But Iran was ready to attack Israel. WAR!
(2004–2015)
Following the Iraq War, Ritter wrote books and appeared in media arguing the invasion had been based on flawed intelligence. His work focused on arms control, intelligence integrity, and...
(2016–Present)
In recent years Ritter has become a frequent geopolitical commentator, particularly on Russia-Ukraine and NATO policy. His views often criticize U.S. and NATO strategic decisions and emphasize military analysis of conflicts. Supporters view him as an independent analyst; critics argue his assessments can be sympathetic to Russian perspectives.
5/5
In recent years Ritter has become a frequent geopolitical commentator, particularly on Russia-Ukraine and NATO policy. His views often criticize U.S. and NATO strategic decisions and emphasize military analysis of conflicts. Supporters view him as an independent analyst; critics argue his assessments can be sympathetic to Russian perspectives.
5/5
(2000–2003)
After 2000, Scott Ritter became a prominent critic of U.S. claims that Iraq possessed active WMD programs. He argued that inspections in the 1990s had largely dismantled Iraq’s capabil...
(2004–2015)
Following the Iraq War, Ritter wrote books and appeared in media arguing the invasion had been based on flawed intelligence. His work focused on arms control, intelligence integrity, and U.S. foreign policy decisions. During this period he was often associated with anti-war commentary rather than a formal political party.
4/5
Following the Iraq War, Ritter wrote books and appeared in media arguing the invasion had been based on flawed intelligence. His work focused on arms control, intelligence integrity, and U.S. foreign policy decisions. During this period he was often associated with anti-war commentary rather than a formal political party.
4/5
1
(Pre-2000 Political Leanings)
Before 2000, Ritter was generally viewed as aligned with U.S. national-security and arms-control institutions rather than partisan politics. His outlook emphasized strict...
(2000–2003)
After 2000, Scott Ritter became a prominent critic of U.S. claims that Iraq possessed active WMD programs. He argued that inspections in the 1990s had largely dismantled Iraq’s capabilities and warned that intelligence used to justify the 2003 invasion was exaggerated or misrepresented.
3/5
After 2000, Scott Ritter became a prominent critic of U.S. claims that Iraq possessed active WMD programs. He argued that inspections in the 1990s had largely dismantled Iraq’s capabilities and warned that intelligence used to justify the 2003 invasion was exaggerated or misrepresented.
3/5
1
Scott Ritter (born 1961) is a former U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer who served as a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991–1998 with the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM). He became...
(Pre-2000 Political Leanings)
Before 2000, Ritter was generally viewed as aligned with U.S. national-security and arms-control institutions rather than partisan politics. His outlook emphasized strict enforcement of arms-inspection regimes and military intelligence analysis. He was not publicly identified with a clear left/right political movement during that period.
2/5
Before 2000, Ritter was generally viewed as aligned with U.S. national-security and arms-control institutions rather than partisan politics. His outlook emphasized strict enforcement of arms-inspection regimes and military intelligence analysis. He was not publicly identified with a clear left/right political movement during that period.
2/5
1
Scott Ritter (born 1961) is a former U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer who served as a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991–1998 with the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM). He became widely known for publicly disputing U.S. claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction prior to the 2003 Iraq War.
1/5
1/5
1
@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q...
And Seattle has a statue of Lenin that used to be publicly prominent at University of Washington.
There's quite a leap from reading someone's writings, or even praising them and acting in support of their ideas.
Sometimes it helps avoid mistakes to know how others think.
And Seattle has a statue of Lenin that used to be publicly prominent at University of Washington.
There's quite a leap from reading someone's writings, or even praising them and acting in support of their ideas.
Sometimes it helps avoid mistakes to know how others think.
@nprofile1q...
Scott Ritter says their leader we killed has been replaced by someone who is pro nuke, in contrast to the leader that we killed.
Again, have we made things worse?
Scott Ritter says their leader we killed has been replaced by someone who is pro nuke, in contrast to the leader that we killed.
Again, have we made things worse?
There's some great information about the technology of our interceptors and Iran's non-ballistic missiles explained by Scott Ritter.
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZGazMbUn1-I
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZGazMbUn1-I
I guess we never learn, do we?
We just surrendered Afghanistan after nearly 20 years ticking on a guerrilla force, leaving some $85 billion dollars of military equipment and aircraft for the Taliban.
We've even gone so far to pay the Taliban a monthly multi-million dollar grant, for what?
Now we're taking on a country of 93 million, most of whom are furious with the United States for empowering religious fanatics, and they've been planning for this war for decades.
How gullible are we?
We just surrendered Afghanistan after nearly 20 years ticking on a guerrilla force, leaving some $85 billion dollars of military equipment and aircraft for the Taliban.
We've even gone so far to pay the Taliban a monthly multi-million dollar grant, for what?
Now we're taking on a country of 93 million, most of whom are furious with the United States for empowering religious fanatics, and they've been planning for this war for decades.
How gullible are we?
1