@str4t05
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
i guess you also gave Enola Gay a big hug before take off too ๐
๐คก
One of those types. Got it.
I can understand if you're reluctant to believe I'm telling the truth about my background. However, your response demonstrates a lack of interest in real discussion, and fails to address the point I made.
I'm not the kind of person to believe the "official" narrative about everything. There are plenty of unorthodox views which I hold (vaccines are harmful, macroevolution is a lie, 9/11 was probably a false flag, etc.)
However, when I have personal experience which proves a conspiracy false, why wouldn't I share it? Obviously, there is plenty about my time in the Navy I'm unable to share, and little way for me to prove my honesty on a pseudonymous protocol such as Nostr. However, I can at least share links to some of the introductory handbooks I mentioned, if you're interested in doing some research:
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/NNPTC/Physics/doe_phys_nuc.pdf
https://www.standards.doe.gov/standards-documents/1000/1019-bhdbk-1993-v2/
There are more of these handbooks, covering subjects such as chemistry, classical physics, thermodynamics, materials, engineering symbology, etc. Unfortunately, it's difficult to find any links to a single website containing all of them, nowadays.
I can understand if you're reluctant to believe I'm telling the truth about my background. However, your response demonstrates a lack of interest in real discussion, and fails to address the point I made.
I'm not the kind of person to believe the "official" narrative about everything. There are plenty of unorthodox views which I hold (vaccines are harmful, macroevolution is a lie, 9/11 was probably a false flag, etc.)
However, when I have personal experience which proves a conspiracy false, why wouldn't I share it? Obviously, there is plenty about my time in the Navy I'm unable to share, and little way for me to prove my honesty on a pseudonymous protocol such as Nostr. However, I can at least share links to some of the introductory handbooks I mentioned, if you're interested in doing some research:
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/NNPTC/Physics/doe_phys_nuc.pdf
https://www.standards.doe.gov/standards-documents/1000/1019-bhdbk-1993-v2/
There are more of these handbooks, covering subjects such as chemistry, classical physics, thermodynamics, materials, engineering symbology, etc. Unfortunately, it's difficult to find any links to a single website containing all of them, nowadays.
germany generates most of the electricity, these "nuclear power stations" just help balance the load
why do u think germany subsidises solar so heavily? they getting free energy for the grid.
Sorry, but if you're claiming nuclear power as a whole is impossible or a hoax, you're wrong. Most conspiracy theories about the nature of nuclear power or radiation are just the result of paranoid people trying to explain things they don't understand the science behind.
As someone who has personally operated and maintained a nuclear reactor & associated systems aboard a submarine for years, I can say that nuclear power definitely does exist. The scientific and practical knowledge behind it is routinely taught to hundreds of students annually within the US Navy alone. The basic concepts aren't any great secret, and have been freely accessible to the public within Department of Energy training handbooks for decades.
On a nuclear submarine, there is no other long-term source of power. The submarine's battery is incapable of providing power longer than a few hours, cannot provide the steam power needed for high speed propulsion, and is routinely charged using electricity from the nuclear reactor. The emergency diesel generator is rarely used outside of emergencies and routine maintenance/training. Nuclear submarines operate for months, even years, without external power input being necessary.
As someone who has personally operated and maintained a nuclear reactor & associated systems aboard a submarine for years, I can say that nuclear power definitely does exist. The scientific and practical knowledge behind it is routinely taught to hundreds of students annually within the US Navy alone. The basic concepts aren't any great secret, and have been freely accessible to the public within Department of Energy training handbooks for decades.
On a nuclear submarine, there is no other long-term source of power. The submarine's battery is incapable of providing power longer than a few hours, cannot provide the steam power needed for high speed propulsion, and is routinely charged using electricity from the nuclear reactor. The emergency diesel generator is rarely used outside of emergencies and routine maintenance/training. Nuclear submarines operate for months, even years, without external power input being necessary.