That sounds really neat!

I'll keep an open mind. It’s not that hard to just not merge a contentious change. Core is basically asking for Knots to be relevant ... and if I’m Luke, I’d take advantage of that.

Maybe Core can’t be opinionated as the reference, fine.

But Knots is where some/most Bitcoiners line up. And like Tomer said, this is just the reality now ... Knots is here to stay if Core won’t listen. Core’s being questioned, and rightfully so.

I'd imagine at some point he's got no choice but to pull in another maintainer or something.

>> but this is maintainer status <<

So... it's gotta be someone who can impress Luke, line up with Knots, and actually know Core deep >> if it's even possible to convince Luke they qualify LOL

What's not "mathematically" plausible??

I mean Knots can evolve into a team structure to have multiple maintainers just like Core?

Knots

Good nostr!