No. Modern science merely postulates a disease and then tests a substance or treatment. If the treatment doesn't work, the disease is still presumed real. That's anti-scientific. Maybe we have the disease wrong.
The problem with the scientific model is that it no longer looks for difference.
When medicine first started "outliers" were looked at as being different for some reason, and often as evidence of a different disease. Now the disease is presumed "known" and outliers are just placebo effects