Oh my this is bad. The private keys of eight eMudhra intermediate CA certificates have been compromised. They chain to roots trusted by the Mozilla, Microsoft, Apple and Chrome root programs and by many downstream trust stores.

eMudhra Intermediate CA Compromise

https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/

Wine Ported to OpenBSD https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179236125692175

This 💯

Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

Bank of America hired 1,000 contractors to patch software flaws exposed by Anthropic's Mythos https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/14/anthropic-mythos-bank-of-america-hiring-cost.html

Why can't AI patch the flaws it found? Lmao. Who is gonna tell them about the bugs being created to fix these? Also note how they hired contractors and not the employees. They think fixing security is one time job. Oh, my sweet summer child.

PSA: Google is silently linking your phone number across all signed-in accounts https://www.androidauthority.com/google-auto-phone-number-verification-android-3723117/

Anyone surprised by this? Every AI and tech company wakes up each day asking the same question. How can we build an even bigger surveillance network, squeeze more profit out of it and turn George Orwell’s 1984 into reality? At this point, they are not predicting the dystopian future. They’re building it and charging its users for it. Truly evil stuff.

NetBSD may have found a new role: The AI-free FOSS OS

https://www.theregister.com/os-platforms/2026/10/13/netbsd-may-have-found-a-new-role-the-ai-free-foss-os/5302818

Anthropic: Don't be mean or cruel to our models. They can feel pain. Your account will be banned if you are mean to our LLMs.

Me: Can a shitty AI feel pain? 🤔

No. It can't. These people at Anthropic are crazy nuts. They are trying to prove their shity AI built with stolen data has emotions, anger, it can hack and tried to bribe religious group to accept their AI and preach its AI has a soul.

Anthropic are bunch of psychopaths and delusional peoples.

Source https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6j9k1l72wkgo

As a hypothetical case, lets assume LLMs get good at coding and someone builds millions of lines of code that exactly duplicate Photoshop or MS Office and its all open source. People start using these LLM clones in masses and stop paying those companies. Let’s see how they react then, because they always claim that’s just how humans learn and that it isn’t copyright infringement. There shouldn’t be any github take downs or copyright infringement lawsuits then, right?

Decades ago, I never trusted the likes of Microsoft and other proprietary vendors. Now, I don't trust OpenAI, Anthropic, Google & other AI tech bros either. I was right back then and I will be proven right again soon. It is just matter of time..

Are you blindly trusting them with your data or are you waiting until its again too late to protect yourself? That is the one thing you need to watch out for.

Margaret Hamilton, computing pioneer who led software development for the Apollo program, dies at 90. Over two decades at MIT, Hamilton forged new paths in computer science and engineering. Her groundbreaking work included leading the team that programmed the first computers that took humans to the moon https://news.mit.edu/2026/margaret-hamilton-computing-pioneer-dies-1007 #RIP

OpenAI “rogue” agent activities found on Wikimedia projects

https://diff.wikimedia.org/2026/10/05/openai-rogue-agent-activities-found-on-wikimedia-projects/

Why is this acceptable? You need to be able to press charges against OpenAI or any AI company that is running a "rogue" agent for hacking or similar malicious attacks. If a normal human does this, they are held responsible. So, the same responsibility should apply here and charges should be pressed against the CTO/CEO/CSO.