Про пиндосов то уже вообще чего говорить. У этих ребятушек пыточные по всему миру, а об законы стран типа Японии эти вообще ноги вытирают. Ну как бы они и заслужили, такое с собой обращение. Но страдают то и кто проездом 😂

Уже всё объяснили.

I agree that AI slop is worse than human-written code. Not necessarily in terms of quality - it might actually be better in that regard - but in terms of structure.

As soon as you unleash AI on your codebase, you start noticing how it becomes more "fractal", losing the clean, "crystalline" structure it had before AI touched it.

And honestly, maybe it's just me, but AI-generated code is hard to work with, and I don't particularly want to. It makes me want to have another LLM fix the problems created by the first one.

Still, I think that if you find the right balance, AI can be a pretty good tool.

Well, I review the code afterward whenever I can and make adjustments as needed.

In my experience, AI generally lacks consistency. It might add unnecessary libraries to tests, put functions in different files without much structure, create redundant tests, or write README files full of development-related context.

Nothing particularly serious, though.

14? Wow, dude, slow down

Well, that's a shame. It's about time people learned to tell Nostr apart from Bluetooth.

I read somewhere that South Korea has something similar, or will have it soon.

I'm actually building a chat client right now, and I can confidently say that 6 out of 10 people have no idea what Nostr is and think they're chatting over Bluetooth.