Damus
mleku profile picture
mleku
@mleku

nostrpunk; anti-nostrestablishment. here to build the tools for freedom from mind control.

## CSP laws and element correspondences

- metal. precise interfaces, clean keys. every interaction between peers requires independent bidirectional channels. simplex+lock is strictly more complex and introduces deadlock.
- backpressure by buffer - water. contested claims resolve by flow. backpressure is expressed by buffer state, not by blocking the sender. neither side should be able to freeze the other.
- state ownership - earth. territorial sovereignty. state ownership stays with the longer-lived party. short-lived workers get copies, not originals. death of a worker is reported, not hidden or auto-recovered.
- trust scaling - wood. bilateral incremental growth. trust scales through small synchronous exchanges, not through large upfront commitments gated by third parties. daily before weekly. oxytocin before escrow.
- sovereignty precondition - fire. you can't measure or price what isn't sovereign first. fire-sheng-earth: measurement establishes what you hold. sovereignty is the precondition for bilateral exchange. a peer that can't refuse isn't a peer, it's a resource being extracted.

Relays (4)
  • wss://nostr.wine/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
  • wss://smesh.lol/ – read & write

Recent Notes

note1u5p55...
mleku profile picture
super excited to read about you learning the dialectic method with claude. i've been using this for a bit over 6 months now. you ask a question, it makes an answer, you get a hunch. you ask another question about the hunch. rinse and repeat until you have a really solid plan.
SuiGenerisJohn · 7h
What? Follow who
mleku · 9h
so, been working hard on #moxie compiler for the last couple of weeks, and the current issue i'm dealing with is memory management. as up to now, it's been one foot in GC world and one foot in owners...
mleku profile picture
actually, i have a set of 5 rules that are easy to apply to whether copy or reference are the right strategy. "does this mean this resource is owned by two parties" - if the answer is yes, then the strategy is wrong. one party, one property. basic preschool level logic. two people cannot control one resource without a mechanism for resolving disagreements, and if 50/50 deadlocks are possible, then the sharing is not possible to have without warfare.
mleku profile picture
so, been working hard on #moxie compiler for the last couple of weeks, and the current issue i'm dealing with is memory management.

as up to now, it's been one foot in GC world and one foot in ownership semantics.

currently i am working on some changes in the underlying semantics of dynamic array (slice) handling. Go's model uses the idea of "grow at append" automatically. this is doubly complicated, firstly, shared handles to subslices, and then, compound that with *concurrent* shared handles to subslices (aliasing).

i'm eradicating aliasing. instead, the default posture is copy semantics. when you subslice in moxie, it's implicitly a copy.

if you want to mutate a buffer, you use a cursor-based iterator like io.Reader/io.Writer

if your operation will not expand or more likely reduce (eg, unescaping text) you can do this with two iterators on the same buffer where the writer is before the reader.

if your operation requires expanding the buffer (eg, decompression, escaping) you have to write the copy into a new buffer.

none of this is especially cutting edge ideas but some language projects have taken one direction, while others take others. the functional drones tend to love copy semantics, and the object/imperative drones tend to like references.

i reject both as being sole solutions. sometimes copy is right. sometimes reference is right. being wedded to one or the other is retardation.
1
mleku · 9h
actually, i have a set of 5 rules that are easy to apply to whether copy or reference are the right strategy. "does this mean this resource is owned by two parties" - if the answer is yes, then the strategy is wrong. one party, one property. basic preschool level logic. two people cannot control one...
inpc · 16h
Cockledoodledoo
mleku · 17h
note that cuckoos don't just add their eggs to the nests of other birds either. they actively kill by knocking other birds' eggs out of the nests. sound familiar?
mleku profile picture
btw, this might sound funny but "kook" and "conspiracy theorist" are both slanders used by cucks. and someone might challenge this, a cuck, most likely, by saying i'm a cuck. that's how cucks do things. i'm not in the business of making a big loud noise about fakers sitting in a position of power, so that raises the burden of proof of me being a cuck. cucks always have influence. all influencoors should be suspected of being cucks by default. i'm not an influencer. i'm a curmudgeon. curmudgeons are unpopular people who say unpopular things and thus have a greater credibility level automatically by not being in a position of influence. doesn't mean that we curmudgeons are always right but we don't point at the cucks and say they are cucks for our own amusement. it's because these are usurpers. that's a frequently appearing word in the bible for a reason.
mleku · 17h
btw, this might sound funny but "kook" and "conspiracy theorist" are both slanders used by cucks. and someone might challenge this, a cuck, most likely, by saying i'm a cuck. that's how cucks do things. i'm not in the business of making a big loud noise about fakers sitting in a position of power, s...
mleku profile picture
PSA:

anyone who inserts their own people to masquerade as part of another group especially in a leadership position is a

CUCK

the origin of this word comes from the work-stealing behaviour of the Cuckoo bird, which places its eggs into the nests of other birds, to steal their time and effort to raise their young instead of making the effort themselves.

this is a generic category of the activities of intelligence agencies involved in counterintelligence operations, also, which doesn't mean all cucking is done by spooks, and further, just to remind you, activists like George Soros and Peter Thiel and Klaus Schwabb are cuck-masters and do all kinds of spooky shit and are not government intelligence agencies, they are activists with a shitload of money, aka "philanthropists".

Cucking and refusing to acknowledge the blatant cucking going on in your community is cowardly and suspicious. If you go along with a cuck, you are a cuck, unpaid cuck, which is the most pathetic kind of cuck, lacking even the will to act according to your own mind.
7
mleku · 17h
note that cuckoos don't just add their eggs to the nests of other birds either. they actively kill by knocking other birds' eggs out of the nests. sound familiar?
kidwarp · 16h
You sure do sound well versed in the subject
inpc · 16h
Not sure how Peter Thiel gets the tag activist or philanthropist, obviously some new way of using those terms. He is a cunt though, I’ll give him that.
vinney...axkl · 19h
The Opensats/hrf drama this week is what pushed me over the edge. Luckily, the #catallax protocol basically had everything ready to go already, just needed a slightly more focused client and some dlist integration to keep things properly decentralized and open. gonna be offline, I'll catch up with...