@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... Thanks Graham. Maybe. I did a ton of research and it looks like Portuguese is the next best language so I'm working on that at the moment.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... Sweet, thanks Eric. Too bad we didn't get to catch up more at PyCon. But makes me glad we did get a chance to talk on the first day.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... I love the idea of your post. I’ll cover it next week.

@nprofile1q... Thanks for coming on the podcast Chris! :)

@nprofile1q... awesome. #teambulma :)

@nprofile1q... Sounds fun! Not entirely sure about the instance, though Fosstodon seems nice. Happy to share an invite

@nprofile1q... definitely. I’m running some Go and some NextJS and don’t know either. Got a good guest lined up.

@nprofile1q... Makes sense Jeff, thanks!

@nprofile1q... Hey Glyph! Fair, but if Glasswing spent $1M on security research for this Firefox thing, a similar question then could be, has the PSF/Core devs spent a dedicated $1M discovery process with real humans? I'm guessing no. But given the price of zero days and the speed multiplier of AI, someone might to get zero days on the main runtimes and that could be a problem. If Anthropic is handing out thsis for free, we should try to be in the mix.

@nprofile1q... Thanks and interesting.

First and third article are just speculation though. They didn't have access to the model. The third says “No Glasswing partner has confirmed a single specific finding" though I think Firefox counts as findings.

The second one didn't say it didn't work. Just that their system of scaffolding seemed to do much of the discovery already. (1/2)