Damus
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
shortwavesurfer2009
@shortwavesurfer2009

#Monero using #libertarian who loves computer networking, distributed systems, privacy tech, and testing beta software. I may not be a pro, but I can file a mean bug report.

Donate Monero (XMR): https://kuno.anne.media/fundraiser/zzn3/
Annual Expenses: 59 XMR

42WimCbGoy5SVZfkr5YdwtAg9jvpxFfNXfBjM2CJAUZC9JNAKZ34hF6a35HJNXWyw1ctxhSKp4MjfgR3uT8Eneq4GCwtqTs

https://smp15.simplex.im/a#P99yLk0Wm9o1qks_M4uuf5cTqz8mua9QhyaByz2gIR8

Relays (7)
  • wss://nos.lol/ – write
  • wss://nostr.mom/ – write
  • wss://nostr.sethforprivacy.com/ – write
  • wss://nostr.xmr.rocks/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – write
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – write
  • wss://xmr.usenostr.org/ – read & write

Recent Notes

Final · 12h
The Signature is their leading flagship device outside of their foldables. We were held back from supporting this device because Qualcomm didn't have production memory tagging security features yet. With the next generation processors we have been told they absolutely will. This could hopefully ope...
Final · 1d
We are happy to announce a long-term partnership with Motorola. Together, we will collaborate on new future devices that meet our stringent privacy and security standards. https://motorolanews.com/mo...
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
I highly doubt this is going to be the 0.5 Monero Moto G line and probably be more like a 2 Monero device. That's fine of course, but having extremely cheap privacy devices that work well enough for most users would be amazing as well. Hell, the Moto G2024 has better Geekbench scores than my current phone does, and it was released in 2021, and it has double the storage, and I came across it because I was looking at what devices from Motorola have support for Lineage OS.

#Monero
1
Final · 15h
It will initially be Motorola's flagship devices but could trickle down to other devices in the future. If you want an idea of their flagships look at the Motorola Signature (2026) and Motorola Razr Fold (2026) for the current generation ones not quite meeting our requirements yet. It will be upcomi...
kidwarp · 15h
How do we know that it’s not a shell company like the ones used in the pager bombs…
Nighteous · 1d
Interesting, I always thought tor worked like the normal domain land where you got a single domain. Didn't know this was a thing that you can spin up multiple links! nostr:nevent1qqsrquretz8f4zfnam...
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
Each domain is actually a public and private key pair, so you can spin up as many public and private key pairs as you want, technically.

You just point them all at the same actual service. So if, for example, it's a web server, you can just spin up 30 keys and point them all at the same web server and it will function.
1
Nighteous · 1d
Interesting! So I can startup a webserver and everyone would be able to access it without me buying any domain etc etc? :O
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
Oh fun. Some researchers found a way to exploit the Tor onion proof of work system. It's supposed to keep an adversary from doing a denial of service attack on the server by exhausting all of its resources, and for that job it does work.

However, it introduces another denial of service attack where the attacker doesn't actually overwhelm the server with data, but it just tricks the server into thinking it's being overwhelmed and causes the difficulty to rise to the maximum possible value and keep most clients from being able to connect.

The researchers created their own algorithm that exponentially increased the amount that it would cost to perform the attack from a trivial low amount to something like 1.06 Monero per hour per onion service.

So a website with a single address would cost 1.06 XMR per hour to attack, which is still pretty low, but a website with 30 addresses would take 1.06*30 = 31.8XMR/hr to attack.

spinning up a bunch of addresses is not a particularly hard thing to do so that's one mitigation and would keep anybody with extremely limited resources from being able to pull off that attack

In the example above 31.8 Monero per hour to attack the service is a pretty steep cost.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clPuPukCIms

#Tor

Daedalus · 2d
5 or 21 sat micro transactions back and forth between people is probably 90% of the Lightning volume.
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
So Alaska Anon brought this to my attention: https://www.goblincards.com/

"THE ONLY NON-KYC PHYSICAL CARD

Get a Physical Mastercard with no KYC. Deposit BTC, ETH, SOL, XMR, or USDT, spend in USD, EUR, MXN and more worldwide. Essential for ATM cash withdrawals."

$350USD setup fee + $100USD renewal fee (every 3 years) + $100USD lost card replacement. 4% deposit fee.

Ofrnxmr mentioned that the cake pay master cards can be shipped to you physically and need name and address to activate and the goblin card would also need name and address because otherwise how would they know where to ship it.

#Monero
🔥1
Cyph3rp9nk · 2d
Why do you like it? There are more than seven clients that have been doing the same thing since long before Bitchat. Bitchat hasn't invented anything and is useless.
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
The only other one I am aware of is Briar, which is Android only. In parts of the world, being Android only is not a disadvantage, but in other parts of the world, being Android only might very well be a disadvantage. I know so many people with Ispies that it's ridiculous.
❤️1
Daedalus · 4d
Yeah it stays open as a persistent notification and keeps syncing in the background. At least on my phone it does.
shortwavesurfer2009 profile picture
Oh, yeah, I see what you mean. We were thinking about two different types of background sync.

I was thinking of the way cake does it, where the phone wakes up every say 24 hours, pulls down the most current blocks, and looks at them with the spend key, and persists them in cash, until you open the wallet, and it can check with the spend key to see if any outgoing transactions in those blocks are yours or not.