Damus

Recent Notes

Phill Cabral · 13h
It is indeed a bet in a prosperous future.
bootlace · 1d
Add: allow giving a rating to those that one follows, so higher-rated-follow posts float a little higher in the feed
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ · 1d
True. I think it is mostly our ego, that wants to make itself heared, while not giving much value to the exchange.
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ · 1d
Thank you for this nice exchange. And thank you for your genuine questions and critiques πŸ™Œ
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ · 1d
Yes I am sorry. I thought to get a more practicle answer and then forgot it. Practicle answer now: I would argue, that IP is a stimulant for strong resilient monopolies to survive longer. The monopolists usually have the longer timepreference. So when they see a very good patent, they buy it or even...
Max · 1d
You need much more than just capital to be successful. And again, they wouldn't steal from anyone in this case. A business does not own the future purchase decisions of future customers, that would ...
John profile picture
Unrestricted more capital than all competitors will eventually play out so that the monopoly either acquires or copies everything in its way.

That extends beyond the scope IP laws ofc. But as a person that hates most things governments do, I don’t see how a fair competition that benefits the consumers can occur without some regulations.
1
Max · 1d
It's only a monopoly if force is initiated to stop new entrepreneurs from providing a good or service. Its irrelevant if a business is the only one that provides a service.
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ · 1d
In the real world no entity has unlimited amounts of purchasing power. So when they buy undiscriminatory everything, they will go bankrupt. And intellectual property is not stopping anyone from buying intellectual property. It only creates the opportunity for someone to imagine to have the illusion...
Joe Martin · 1d
Obviously someone monetizing your music instead of yourself is an extremely hypothetical scenario, but it's just to make a point. Obviously the music itself isn't scarce once it's on the internet and ...
John profile picture
@Max @freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ Wouldn’t IP laws help prevent monopolies that can forever crush new entrants? If Amazon could rip off every single IP protected hardware without consequences, their infinite budget would always allow them to outcompete against startups with better ideas, no?

This is a great thread btw thanks for chiming in!
1
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ · 1d
Good point John. Maby just to say. You evaluate intellectual property (if it is good or not), while the analysis of Max rather states, that it is an illusion (it does not exist). So it is not evaluating intellectual property as bad. It is simply stating, that it does not exist within the realm of p...
Max · 1d
You need much more than just capital to be successful. And again, they wouldn't steal from anyone in this case. A business does not own the future purchase decisions of future customers, that would be slavery.
John profile picture
Don’t worry, Siri AI on iOS 27 is still quite retarded.

Jokes aside, you can ask it questions about your messages or email and ot finally has device wide context to be somewhat useful once in a while.
2πŸ˜‚1
FreedomTech · 2d
Give big tech access to your entire device? Many consider that a privacy risk, especially given the track record of Big Tech on the matter. No thanks. I'll stick with DeGoogled or Linux phones