Damus
Open in Damus
mark profile picture
mark
@mark

arts • investing • games • tech • philosophy • bitcoin

npub1h2sfcqslrmsmrkchapkpmvqj9fr662jdeaftjyuma8kmfmdpcspsgazhwdnpub
[email protected]nip05
https://markmulvey.comwebsite
[email protected]lnurl
Relays (11)
  • wss://nostr.wine/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.band/ – read
  • wss://eden.nostr.land/ – read & write
  • wss://purplepag.es/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr-pub.semisol.dev/ – read & write
  • wss://puravida.nostr.land/ – read & write
  • wss://relayable.org/ – read & write
  • wss://atlas.nostr.land/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.orangepill.dev/ – read & write
  • wss://brb.io/ – read & write

Recent Notes

ethfi · 5d
Caterpillar to butterfly
Based Truth · 5d
Wake up, they're using Sound of Metal to condition you for the coming silent wars, frequencies control your mind
Jordan Eskovitz · 5d
🤝
mark profile picture
Bibles are an $80 million business

King James, American Standard, English Standard, New International, Christian Standard, New Living Translation, Good News Translation, Study Bibles, Revised Bibles...

which is the best Bible?
9
Laser · 5d
KJV, LSB, NSB are the Big 3 for everyday reformed Christians. For deeper work, NASB95+Septuagint+NT in original Greek.
Chris Krause · 5d
They have all been altered. That makes me sceptical.
Dani · 5d
My preference for English: ESV For Spanish: Reina Valera de 1960
BitBees · 5d
The one you read .
Jordan Eskovitz · 5d
This may be a lot more info than you are interested in, but here are my thoughts in as condensed of a way as I can put them. Also, full disclosure, I work for Crossway which created and publishes the ESV translation: I'm not sure what you mean by *best* but what I would argue the best thing you can...
RandalM · 5d
If you're a beginner, try International English Bible: https://iebible.net/ We gave copies to all our kids and my mom.
mark profile picture
from Alex Berg:

"When evaluating the claim of deep bag-biased Quantum agitpropagandists, it’s always more useful to look at what they are NOT telling you.

Recent claims suggest a Quantum computer using neutral atom arrays would require only (!) ~20,000 logical qubits to break Bitcoin.

What they tell you is that this is significant because researchers at Caltech recently demonstrated a 6000 (!) logical qubits array.

What they do NOT tell you is that those qubits weren’t not entangled, which is a requirement to run Shor’s algorithm.

So what is the state of the art in terms of actually entangled logical qubits under the neutral atoms architecture? NINETY SIX (96) qubits.

How long did they maintain coherence? 1-2 seconds.

How long did the new Oratomic paper suggest the algorithm they designed should run? DAYS!

So not only must state of the art in SIMPLE qubits entanglement increase more than 2 orders of magnitude, their ability to maintain coherence across circuit depth must be preserved ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND times longer than they currently do.

Suffice to say they have no idea how to even get there but that shouldn’t get in the way of a headline worthy paper!"

mark @mark · 1w
new quantum fud just dropped from google ✨ well, it's not deliberate fud but it has stoked unwarranted fear still purely theoretical, they're just projecting progress to revise their predicted timeline as per usual. great marketing strategy to stay relevant in the news cycle. Show more
mark profile picture
new quantum fud just dropped from google ✨ well, it's not deliberate fud but it has stoked unwarranted fear

still purely theoretical, they're just projecting progress to revise their predicted timeline as per usual. great marketing strategy to stay relevant in the news cycle.

plus most bitcoin is held in addresses where the public key isn't exposed (at least not until it's spent), so this theoretical achievement would only affect those reusing addresses.

anyway, it's not nothing but it's certainly not something

https://quantumai.google/static/site-assets/downloads/cryptocurrency-whitepaper.pdf