calle
· 20w
This is a long post that hopefully bridges some gaps between technical people (devs) and non-technical users and how they look at spam prevention in Bitcoin. I hope that it clarifies why I think that ...
Speaking as one of those non-technical users. From everything I have read about this here, it sounds like both sides of the argument claim the high-ground of not wanting to hurt Bitcoin. I can't really judge who may be right in this or who isn't, but what I find the most disturbing about this whole discussion is that it is even possible to change Bitcoin in a bad way. With Bitcoin being this supposedly immutable, trustless system of money. It's never been hacked, but a few devs can just put out an update and it causes this huge crisis? Doesn't make sense.