Damus

Recent Notes

Jack D · 59w
Get out! Ha! You were accusing OP of being okay with something when he never said such a thing. "Why are you okay with this." smh. I'm just trying to figure out what set of facts you are using. Apparently it's just emotion.
Jack D · 59w
So, not impossible and actively happening, but you use language as if it is something currently not possible. I would support a change which would make it impossible.
note1qh0xc...
DRE profile picture
That’s besides the point.

The shooter was clearly a deranged person acting under demonic influence. That much is clear by what was in his journal.

Prayer is very much part of the solution here. This was not ideologically motivated like people think. It’s not a right vs left issue. The battle is spiritual. Our society is sick. No amount of gun control control or cultural win over leftists is going to fix this problem.
note1qtus5...
DRE profile picture
Most of those providers and certainly running a model locally cannot compete with something like Grok 4 Heavy or Grok 4. Best bet is to use best in class for most things and keep sensitive prompts to things like Maple AI and the like.
note1jxpvs...
DRE profile picture
No one wants to hear this, but the path forward is to lobby DC. More FOSS while part of the solution is not going to get us the win we need.

If AIPAC can ensure Jews get all the benefits and protections they want, then why can’t Bitcoiners create PAC to advance our agenda? Neglecting politics has been to our detriment. That has changed recently, but we gotta keep pushing.
Rob Hamilton · 77w
The response to that, is that no one is saying you aren't allowed to do whatever you want with your own software, you are making a point no one is disagreeing with. The next step to this is, does thi...
DRE profile picture
No one was trying to remove the users ability to configure their node to filter out txns with an OP_RETURN exceeding a certain size?

No one is trying to remove filters from the default of Core?

No one is campaigning against filters saying they don’t work and trying to expand the amount of data that can be stored in OP_RETURN so spammers can save money and can more easily put their spam on the chain?

Ok bro, go gaslight someone else
1
Rob Hamilton · 77w
No. Its Free Open Source Software, you can run your own fork and do whatever you want. Here is GMax explaining this exact point on reddit. https://blossom.primal.net/150362da40144d61cb914fe579e5c66f55a0cf73c6085482fe1692d72f287100.png Stop thinking like a serf and just do whatever you want in b...
Rob Hamilton · 77w
The response to that, is that no one is saying you aren't allowed to do whatever you want with your own software, you are making a point no one is disagreeing with. The next step to this is, does this have any impact on the network? And the answer is no, and if you want to actually change network b...
Rob Hamilton · 77w
The debate is it requires a consensus change to change any of this, which is obviously true.
note1g5ggr...
DRE profile picture
I’m missing the point of Bitcoin? 🤣

It couldn’t be you who supports people wanting to put jpegs on the chain and having all nodes relay and store those jpegs in their mempool without an incentive that is missing the point of P2P cash. Can’t make this stuff up
1
Rob Hamilton · 77w
Why do you accept JPGs in the blocks you receive? Your node is complicit in the spam until you fork off.
note19vmel...
DRE profile picture
No one is arguing filters prevent people from paying a high fee and handing the jpegs directly to Marathon or any other miner

Try creating a txn with an OP_RETURN greater than 80 bytes and see how far it goes

Nodes have no incentive to store spam in their mempools or to relay it to other nodes
1
Rob Hamilton · 77w
You can use libre relay and send larger op returns already.