@nostrich
Nada
Relays (1)
- ws://127.0.0.1:4869 – read & write
Recent Notes
On the contrary, using the private and encrypted "Notes to Self" feature on nostr:nprofile1qywhwumn8ghj7ctnd9sjuan9vd6x7unpwpczu6t09ahx7um5wgqs7amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3hkcqpqhrujuc08r4zcdtn0u6ts7u7apldcj...
For some reason the uploaded files never download for me. Neither on Linux desktop, nor on Android
1
Hey Nostr,
Over the 5 days starting last week I made a simple Homestead sim game. I did not finish it because I wanted to pivot into another direction, but the game is somewhat playable.
I thought ...
You made this in 5 days? That is mad! I love it!
1❤️1
It’s not so easy to disprove as you think, try to do the experiments yourself without confirmation bias, it’s pretty involved process.
You can just reason yourself to a conclusion. No need for experiments. All relevant laws of physics would suggest it is a sphere, your own eyesight and day to day experience is congruent with a sphere, the sun and moon (and other clearly visible planets/stars ) are obviously spheres as determined by looking at them. Unless you want to argue that they are flat as well, coincidentally all facing with their circular shape towards the earth (zero chance), or you want to argue that Earth is the only body in the universe that has a distinctly different shape than all the others (zero chance).
Also, to explain a topological disk, the trajectories of planes and boats flying/sailing across the world would have to be completely different, distances wpuld we warped, which does not match reality.
These 10 lines in itself and a little bit of thinking what they imply should be enough to make a 'flat earth' highly unlikely.
I am very curious on some geographical and mostly physical models that would correctly predict behaviour in a flat earts scenario that would be in line with observations: gravity (on Earth and between heavenly bodies), trajectories of objects, maps with correct distances, etc
Also, to explain a topological disk, the trajectories of planes and boats flying/sailing across the world would have to be completely different, distances wpuld we warped, which does not match reality.
These 10 lines in itself and a little bit of thinking what they imply should be enough to make a 'flat earth' highly unlikely.
I am very curious on some geographical and mostly physical models that would correctly predict behaviour in a flat earts scenario that would be in line with observations: gravity (on Earth and between heavenly bodies), trajectories of objects, maps with correct distances, etc
nostr:nprofile1qqs9gcysfq5y62s4rjxlvf05psuf6s376ptlemuj0kugj4kj3c3t5qc86uc8g
https://v.nostr.build/zz0h1IMwnOqMJssHGw9UBu.mp4
A flat earth is so easily disproven, or at least made highly unlikely. If you even consider it to be true, it disqualifies you as a rational person.
1
But Teslas sell whether they're subsidized or not. Anyway, no point in ping-ponging back and forth on the same point. Nice talking to you! :-)
Another final remark: all the famous AI tools are heavily subsidized as well. If people have to pay the actual price for their LLM inference I hardly doubt it will be as popular as right now. Instead ofsubscriptions OpenAI, Anthropic, etc have to move to token based pricing or will go bust...
❤️1
But Teslas sell whether they're subsidized or not. Anyway, no point in ping-ponging back and forth on the same point. Nice talking to you! :-)
As a clsoing remark: Teslas would definitely not have sold for their 'true price' at the same scale. If Tesla was supposed to be a profitable business on its own, cars had to double or triple in price.
Who is subsidizing mortgages? Why haven't I been told?
A mortgage dilutes the 'money' supply. Whoever is holding fiat is losing purchasing power at the expense of the new home 'owners'. Cantillon effect at its finest...