Bitcoiners fight during bear markets and cheer during bull markets. It’s the nature of the beast lol

Regarding the filters debate, if Core had rolled back the OP_R change in good faith immediately, a lot of this divorce would have been avoided.

I think spam fees are a negligible part of the miners’ revenues today, but the effect of accumulating monkey JPEG dust is really bad long term for node decentralization, so that disconnect is what’s driving this. Once we can get back to reasonable filters we should continue to diversify mining and hopefully ProductionReady and other nodes get market share.

And then price will moon :)

Nothing in that post provides any warning about the wallet bug. I’m starting to think you’re delusional.

It seems like we have more in common than you think, I’m also very supportive of decentralizing mining and supporting new alternative implementations, (although I do run BIP-110 on my Knots node).

Is BIP-110 perfect? No. But it’s the only reasonable way I see of changing course and revert the development monopoly of Core, which I’m at this point very sure is compromised and will keep pushing gradual degradation of the protocol to weaken it slowly. Our enemies are smart, have money printers, and lots of patience to infiltrate the most centralized aspect of Bitcoin today.

You’re a liar, post the link under here to your “purported” note dated prior to the bug deletion fix date by Core.

If you can’t, it doesn’t exist.

On activation methodology, there is no other option. We can’t give veto power to hostile miners like F2Pool, who also mines Ethereum!

BIP-110 is a reaction to overreach by Core, who increased the attack surface for no real gain ignoring the will of the community (the OP_R uncap had 4 to 1 nacks to acks and plenty of grassroots opposition). Legal risks are real if Core keeps pushing Bitcoin from monetary network to file storage network, for example allowing huge arbitrary data in the designated arbitrary data section. The fact that a hack (libre relay) was created by a bad actor doesn’t mean we have to legitimize it.

Are you closely associated with Core? Because BIP-110 is also a reaction to several figures showing up in the Epstein files. Core has been co-opted.

You make lots of clams and provide no proof - show me where to warned in advance about the wallet deletion bug in Core v30 as you claimed in your post.

What proof? You just said you did things but gave no proof.

A lot of talking but no proof provided, should I simply take you at your word?

Well you’re right that it’s not definitive - I have to rely on public information and don’t have any specific insider information. But I’m revealing a suspicious pattern:

- Strategy has deep ties to intelligence which have not been revealed to retail investors.
- It has a highly classified classification.
- It hired way overqualified intelligence individuals for a very small amount of government sales.
- Covert BTC accumulation via Strategy would make a lot of sense for a government which doesn’t want to give the game away early, and complies with the “budget neutral” SBR requirement, since they could 6102 the stack later.

The soft fork mechanism is similar.. do you have reading comprehension issues?

And what is your problem with BIP-110?

You should be embarrassed to come here to white knight for this fraud.

Yes, BIP-11 was great if you wanted to reveal your wallet structure immediately lol. It’s like I’m saying that the printing press made making books at scale possible, and you try to dunk on me saying that aktchually some dude in China was pressing seals on parchment before then. Get a grip.

Send me a link to your warnings about the v30 wallet deletion bug, because if you can’t show it, you just sound narcissistically unhinged.