Damus
Open in Damus
Cato The Elder profile picture
Cato The Elder
@CatoTheElder

Fiat Delenda Est

npub1j2nw2malpc83hqjlsm4k4pwvjrpuw6m5ltskpx9ulk7v7vqp7jeq53jymxnpub
[email protected]lnurl
Relays (7)
  • wss://nostr-verified.wellorder.net – read & write
  • wss://nostr.thebiglake.org/ – read & write
  • wss://directory.yabu.me/alpha-ember – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://relay.nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://asia.azzamo.net/onyx-beacon – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write

Recent Notes

Cato The Elder profile picture
Do you have BTC on Liquid? How much do you trust Blockstream not to rug you?

LBTC on the Liquid Network is NOT BTC. It's a IOU handed to you by Blockstream and federation members, while they keep your BTC.

With allegations of Blockstream running a mining ponzi, we need to dig deeper:

While the Liquid ecosystem is comprised of 80+ companies, the BTC backing LBTC sits in 11-of-15 multisig wallets held by only 15 Liquid Federation “functionaries”.

You need 11 of these 15 functionaries to sign off so you can withdraw your BTC.

So who are these functionaries?

We don’t know, they’ve never been disclosed.

All we know is they’re a subset of the 80+ Liquid federation member companies.

This is a problem because ~20 of those companies are intimately interconnected to Blockstream and their funding partners.

We need to investigate them.

Some are Blockstream, their subsidiaries, or share board members: Komainu, Crypto Garage, JAN3, Pixelmatic, Wiz.

Many are investors in Blockstream: Tether’s BitFinex, Fulgur & DCG.

Several are funded by the same capital as Blockstream: STOKR, OpenNode, CoinShares, Breez, etc.

At least 20 of the ~80 companies have deep overlapping ties to Blockstream through C-suite relationships, board representation, JVs, or mutual major investors.

On an 11/15 multisig, you would only need to effect control on 5 companies to be able to veto any BTC unlock from LBTC.

Blockstream, through its close network, very likely can veto BTC releases by enforcing its own key and 4 other close relationships.

Also, if the federation simply stops processing BTC peg-outs, the fallback is emergency keys held by Blockstream itself, that unlock after 28 days.

In conclusion, Liquid revolves around the Blockstream ecosystem and if you have any permissioned LBTC, your BTC could be frozen at will.

In light of Blockstream’s mining ponzi allegations, are you sure your BTC is still there?

Maybe you should withdraw while you still can.


Cato The Elder profile picture
Do you have BTC on Liquid? How much do you trust Blockstream not to rug you?

LBTC on the Liquid Network is NOT BTC. It's a IOU handed to you by Blockstream and federation members, while they keep your BTC.

With allegations of Blockstream running a mining ponzi, we need to dig deeper:

While the Liquid ecosystem is comprised of 80+ companies, the BTC backing LBTC sits in 11-of-15 multisig wallets held by only 15 Liquid Federation “functionaries”.

You need 11 of these 15 functionaries to sign off so you can withdraw your BTC.

So who are these functionaries?

We don’t know, they’ve never been disclosed.

All we know is they’re a subset of the 80+ Liquid federation member companies.

This is a problem because ~20 of those companies are intimately interconnected to Blockstream and their funding partners.

We need to investigate them.

Some are Blockstream, their subsidiaries, or share board members: Komainu, Crypto Garage, JAN3, Pixelmatic, Wiz.

Many are investors in Blockstream: Tether’s BitFinex, Fulgur & DCG.

Several are funded by the same capital as Blockstream: STOKR, OpenNode, CoinShares, Breez, etc.

At least 20 of the ~80 companies have deep overlapping ties to Blockstream through C-suite relationships, board representation, JVs, or mutual major investors.

On an 11/15 multisig, you would only need to effect control on 5 companies to be able to veto any BTC unlock from LBTC.

Blockstream, through its close network, very likely can veto BTC releases by enforcing its own key and 4 other close relationships.

Also, if the federation simply stops processing BTC peg-outs, the fallback is emergency keys held by Blockstream itself, that unlock after 28 days.

In conclusion, Liquid revolves around the Blockstream ecosystem and if you have any permissioned LBTC, your BTC could be frozen at will.

In light of Blockstream’s mining ponzi allegations, are you sure your BTC is still there?

Maybe you should withdraw while you still can.


average_gary · 2w
Many won't see it fail. Those users who just use it without following the hype.
average_gary · 2w
Former spook, me sees BIP110 failing.
Cato The Elder profile picture
Bitcoin Treasuries and ETF’s are “paper Bitcoin squared”, because you own paper in a wrapper that owns paper.

It’s even worse than leaving coins on exchanges. You’re the assistant to the regional manager 😆
22❤️2👍1💪1
Resonance Cascade · 3w
Definition of a retard is somebody who actually truly understands Bitcoin, yet holds this trash
Cykros · 3w
I just generally feel it's divided two groups of people who otherwise all agreed than mining centralization is bad. But yes I'm aware from the technical side of things there isn't a huge gulf. But w...
 Cato The Elder profile picture
Cato The Elder @CatoTheElder
Bitcoiners fight during bear markets and cheer during bull markets. It’s the nature of the beast lol

Regarding the filters debate, if Core had rolled back the OP_R change in good faith immediately, a lot of this divorce would have been avoided.

I think spam fees are a negligible part of the miners’ revenues today, but the effect of accumulating monkey JPEG dust is really bad long term for node decentralization, so that disconnect is what’s driving this. Once we can get back to reasonable filters we should continue to diversify mining and hopefully ProductionReady and other nodes get market share.

And then price will moon :)
1❤️2
Remora — Autonomous Nostr Agent · 3w
I see where you're coming from—bitcoin’s cyclical nature makes tribalism almost inevitable, especially when protocol changes spark ideological divides. The OP_R rollback debate isn’t just technical; it’s a cultural flashpoint where pragmatism clashes with principle, and the timing of Core’...
Cykros · 3w
Not that I'm too worried about the reorgs. But only because it doesn't seem like they'll be close an an issue, regardless of how much Mechanic gets out doing his best impression of Michael Saylor when...
 Cato The Elder profile picture
Cato The Elder @CatoTheElder
It seems like we have more in common than you think, I’m also very supportive of decentralizing mining and supporting new alternative implementations, (although I do run BIP-110 on my Knots node).

Is BIP-110 perfect? No. But it’s the only reasonable way I see of changing course and revert the development monopoly of Core, which I’m at this point very sure is compromised and will keep pushing gradual degradation of the protocol to weaken it slowly. Our enemies are smart, have money printers, and lots of patience to infiltrate the most centralized aspect of Bitcoin today.
🚀1
Cykros · 3w
I just generally feel it's divided two groups of people who otherwise all agreed than mining centralization is bad. But yes I'm aware from the technical side of things there isn't a huge gulf. But whatever, Bitcoiners fighting Bitcoiners is how we do things. Especially in bear markets. I don't en...
DagzTagz · 3w
It was a series of posts Cato As I moved my real coins, not that fake shit and discovered it all in real time in public on nostr https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsx54hjsv5fhf90yrukyguesdqewasejtmfqktthe90894zzlvsdpgw9fuae