The most annoying part is that all bitcoin hardforks will have great script restoration except Bitcoin, where people will keep arguing that it is too dangerous for 10 more years

Every single day I wake and jews have killed children, children I know, or children I know people who know, but regardless, they keep killing children, every single day.

You should support and celebrate killing zionists

Again, this is all that matters, we already have the rock solid censorship resistance and long term security figured out on L1... Once you have that the ONLY thing that matters is the longevity and sustainability of the second layers, and there is nothing more sustainable and resilient than a Sidechains which can adjust to the market demand or wind down entirely but very slowly and safely that users don't even notice anything.

Can we stop making servers for money and build sidechains exclusively now? The UX is trash otherwise folks.

I still can't understand how is WBTC a better outcome for Bitcoin than Drivechains. It is almost the same result except that users trust a single company and miners don't get paid shit. How is that better?

Put another way; we know there is a significant demand for bridging BTC to other systems, least of all is LN, so why can't we enable miners to operate these bridges as an option? How is that a bad idea?

Hashrate escrow is safer than any unauditable impossible to formally prove code.

The most unfortunate lesson from ColdCard debacle is that Open Source brand will take a long while to recover, and for anything except adversarial situations, there will be no recovery at all, and the only survivors will be trust in specific teams, and possibly hopefully maybe probably not; the interoperability brand.