@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... But they could do this because their employees had more time, power, and productivity due to AI. That's what the post says - use AI not to replace humans but to help them concentrate their efforts in directions that would do the most good.

@nprofile1q... That's because they used AI incorrectly.

*Replacing* humans with AI is wrong and leads to screw-ups like this. The correct thing to do is to *empower* humans with AI.

Here is, for instance, what IKEA did:

@nprofile1q... I'm more worried about race conditions. After all, it shouldn't be possible for more than one process to listen to the same port, so there might be some kind of catfight between them.

@nprofile1q... The section about "you're getting slower" is bullshit. I produce in months what previously took me years. This is not a self-delusion - the boss herself told me that she's amazed by the amount of work I manage to do in such a short time and that she should have bought me a subscription to Claude earlier.

It's all in *how* AI is used. Learn to use it properly. Don't trust it blindly. Verify by hand everything it produces. Use it to solve the boring, repetitive tasks, so that you can concentrate on generating ideas.