Damus

Recent Notes

SatsAndSports · 4w
I used it with Anthropic models (Opus), but switched to Google's Gemini recently and am very happy with it I'll likely just keep switching between whatever models others rave about I'm using OpenCode Zen, to access all the models
deeznuts · 4w
Yes
jb55 · 5w
cool thanks, will check it out
Alexander Hoff ❍ · 12w
hm. yeah no luck unfortunately. i also tried republishing key package. nostr:nprofile1qqs8t4ehcdrjgugzn3zgw6enp53gg2y2gfmekkg69m2d4gwxcpl04acppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0l2sp3z - any idea what the problem could be here?
Alexander Hoff ❍ · 12w
hm no luck. https://blossom.primal.net/a3e949106038d0e32badcad8a2f0cadc14c2de0cd78d9c77adbaf23e7ff9f624.jpg
Matt Corallo · 18w
Please recommend 29, not 28. 29 enables zero-fee-commitments for lightning, which is a really important feature in some cases!
Paulo profile picture
Not sure most people are aware of the benefits (I'm not).
My understanding is that the commitment transaction is basically the transactions you are "passing around" with the other side of a lightning channel, your updates to the "bar tab". There is an issue that if these are too old, when you try to force close a channel, it fails because the fee to the miner is too low, so we need a mechanism for either side to bump the fee.
If this is correct, can you complete it with why is it important to support zero fee commitments and what exactly do they solve? (Or share a link 🙂)

rejon · 21w
🔥
fiatjaf · 52w
Why didn't you feel comfortable about it? That's what everybody does. I do think people should migrate to this scheme I'm proposing for other reasons, but if you have different reasons I'd like to le...
Paulo profile picture
I’m experimenting with building a simple wealth tracker, where you save encrypted records of your assets’ value to a local relay (indexedDB), and sync to a trusted relay.
If your nsec is compromised, the ideal would be for the data to not be revealed without an extra key.

If I’m not mistaken, the scheme you shared allows me to achieve this, since you’d need the device as well to decrypt. And I would add a passphrase, for when the device is compromised.

Am I doing something stupid? 😅
1❤️1
fiatjaf · 52w
If you're doing something stupid I don't know, but to me it looks pretty good. I think your concerns make sense and I'm happy that you gave me another use case for this NIP. I'll mention it in the proposal thread.