Good for you. As a video editor, I survived having to work on reality shows for both Telemundo and Bravo. Even though I was lucky that the people I worked with were super cool, the content was not. You’re better off contributing your time to more positive things in life. My dad lived for a while in Isla and it’s a magical place. Make the most of your time there.

So much resistance to releasing the Epstein files, such blind servitude to Israel… 🤔 Maybe Mossad does have pictures/videos of those golden showers after all…

The conspiracy theorist in me thinks that Google is pushing this crap because Bitcoiners are probably more likely to use privacy-focused devices and services such as Graphene OS phones, Nostr and open source applications.

I feel you’re being racist in your species selection and discriminatory in your medium selection, so here’s a still photograph of a horse just to spite you. 🤣

Ran it through Claude, and this is what I found:

The core document is real — but the framing around it is heavily spun. Here’s the honest breakdown:
What’s actually true:
A 15-page CIA intelligence assessment from October 2021 identified organizations that promoted “motherhood” and “homemaking” as indicators of white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism.  CIA Director Ratcliffe retracted it alongside 18 other assessments, saying it fell short of the agency’s standards of impartiality. 
What the document actually said vs. how it’s being reported:
The assessment primarily focused on groups explicitly promoting racial violence. It discussed a specific redacted organization that lauded motherhood and homemaking — not random suburban moms.  The concern was about extremist groups using traditional values as a recruitment tool, not that homemaking itself was terrorism. 
So the analytical leap the article makes — that the CIA was targeting your average stay-at-home mom — is a significant stretch from what the document actually argued.
The important context nobody’s saying:
The source pushing this hardest is America First Legal, founded by Trump adviser Stephen Miller.  That’s not a neutral watchdog — it’s an advocacy org with an agenda. The document is real; the “war on moms” narrative is their editorial frame.
Bottom line: Legit document, legitimate concern about overly broad intel analysis, but the ZeroHedge/AFL framing turns “extremist groups exploit traditional values for recruitment” into “CIA thinks your wife is a Nazi.” Those are very different claims. The document was sloppy enough that even Ratcliffe retracted it — but it wasn’t a secret program to spy on suburban moms.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

😂🤣

👍🏼👊🏼

So tired of this president. Total clown world.

At least stick to high quality tobacco, like a good cigar. Not the “Bonnie buys the cheap shit” cigarette tobacco. 😂

Screw the banks

Stay humble, stack caps… 😂

That’s the reason I went with MyNode instead of Start9. You can access via OpenVPN or Tailscale.