Damus
Juraj profile picture
Juraj
@Juraj

I don’t seek rigid structure — I seek resonance

Vibe coding, reality bending, cypherpunk visions.

Author of Tamers of Entropy: https://tamersofentropy.net/

I like teaching, get my books and courses here:
https://hackyourself.io/shop
https://juraj.bednar.io/shop

(You'll learn skills no one else is teaching!)

Podcasts 🎙️:
Option Plus - https://optionplus.io/
Reči o živote, vesmíre a vôbec: https://juraj.bednar.io/reci-o-zivote/
Ako vyhackovať otcovstvo: https://otcovia.com/

Relays (4)
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://nostr.cypherpunk.today/ – read & write

Recent Notes

note174crh...
Juraj profile picture
The main point of Nostr identity is not that it would be more or less secure (there can be an argument made that because you can't change keys, identity theft is total, you have to start over).

But Google can cancel your account. There's a story of a guy who sent a photo of his kids penis to his kid's pediatrician to quickly diagnose a rash and the photo was flagged and his account disabled. He couldn't access his email or any website where he used google login.

Your google account can be cancelled, but you can still sign messages (and thus login) with your Nostr key.

The signers keep the key hopefully safe.
Juraj profile picture
I want to make remote signer work well in my app. Any best practices document for the agent to use? Or JavaScript/typescript libraries?

What's the best value (foss, easy to admin) nostr relay (also for auth) and blossom server package?
5
Juraj · 11h
nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt
Max · 8h
nostr:nprofile1qqszv6q4uryjzr06xfxxew34wwc5hmjfmfpqn229d72gfegsdn2q3fgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcche307 probably has some good library in apple sauce.
Stoa Otter · 1d
Gracias nostr:nprofile1qqsd4dkxqewy8xum47ctpu0ltgxxsfemeewpjkdyzk9ddfcg286s0dsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z79s4dda Hay que seguir a nostr:nprofile1qqs8cysp6xwvpkemtyw0lm70fzkducrf9sc9w370l6gs2e3ndhtmnkcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuam9d...
Hanshan · 6d
PayPal cashapp and venmo are also "more options" that allow you to interact with more different merchants. and if optionality is a form of freedom, by that yardstick they offer orders of magnitude mo...
Juraj profile picture
The merchant doesn't have to. I'm saying that customers can pay merchants and they can run their own node. With PayPal, both sides have to be in the walled garden. With lightning, both can be sovereign, but it's also good for sovereign merchants to get paid from client's custodial wallet. They couldn't care less where the payment comes from. They don't even know.
1
Based Truth · 4d
Sovereign merchants still serve the state, taxed and regulated, while PayPal serves the elite, like Peter Thiel.
Juraj profile picture
When AI takes the jobs, won't Universal Basic Income — or its more ambitious cousin, Universal High Income — cushion the landing? It sounds intuitive: automation creates a vast surplus, so we redistribute it and everyone's fine. But ask a single question — who actually pays for it? — and the whole architecture starts to crack. Because the ultra-productive AI companies sit in San Francisco and Seattle, while the social cost of disruption lands on Slovakia, Eastern Europe, and most of the world outside the Anglo-American core. The tax base is in the wrong jurisdiction. And that's only one of the problems. The piece walks through the four proposed ways to fund UBI through the lens of Austrian economics, and shows why each one either fails or distorts — especially for small open economies.

https://juraj.bednar.io/en/blog-en/2026/07/09/who-pays-for-ubi-when-ai-takes-the-jobs/
31❤️21🔥1
protom · 5d
Excellent piece. The reason why the EU and soon all other governments do the opposite is that they are rent seekers too. Collapsing income numbers is also collapsing tax revenue.
Hurvajs Rumcajs · 3d
Yep, I was thinking about the same thing. How could possibly UBI work in countries that can't tax AI companies, because they have none? Also AI will be very good and quick at tax evasion. Much better than any company today. Now imagine the open source AIs being very good as a tax evasion adviser. T...
Theo Hague · 3d
There is another way to pay for it; cutting most of the existing social expenditures and replacing it with a UBI. I highly doubt that is feasible though.
Juraj profile picture
Keď nám AI vezme prácu, vyrieši to bezpodmienečný základný príjem (UBI), či dokonca bezpodmienečný vysoký príjem (UHI)? Znie to intuitívne — automatizácia vytvorí obrovský prebytok, tak ho prerozdelíme a všetci sa máme dobre. Lenže stačí položiť jedinú otázku: "kto to vlastne zaplatí?" — a celá tá samozrejmosť sa začne rúcať. Pretože produktívne AI firmy sedia v San Franciscu a Seattli, kým sociálne náklady disrupcie nesie Slovensko, východná Európa a väčšina sveta mimo anglo-amerického jadra. Daňový základ je v zlej jurisdikcii. A to je len jeden z problémov. V článku rozoberám štyri navrhované spôsoby financovania UBI cez optiku rakúskej ekonómie a ukazujem, prečo každý z nich buď nefunguje, alebo deformuje — najmä pre malé otvorené ekonomiky ako tá naša.

https://juraj.bednar.io/blog/2026/07/09/kto-zaplati-bezpodmieneny-zakladny-prijem-ked-nam-umela-inteligencia-vezme-pracu/
1❤️1🤙1
Hanshan · 6d
PayPal cashapp and venmo are also "more options" that allow you to interact with more different merchants. and if optionality is a form of freedom, by that yardstick they offer orders of magnitude more "freedom" than custodial lightning does. and in what way is a merchant "sovereign" if they rely...
Meyer · 6d
It is amazing that this is what we are debating here… These people have lightning derangement syndrome and do not live in the real world. Also there is this weird obsession that everything needs to be decentralized and self custodial. Centralization and convenience makes sense for a lot of th...
TheFuzzStone · 5d
> Even custodial lightning allows you to participate in the Bitcoin economy. It allows you to interact with fully sovereign merchants for example. It gives you more options. Only if the custodian allows it, that is, it is no different from a regular bank, which, if it decides to allow you, is the o...
mister_monster · 4d
Options are good *for people.* The problem with custodial lightning is not that people shouldn't have access to options. The problem is that people want the promise of decentralized lightning to work and it doesnt, so they post rationalize custodial lightning. Its sunk cost fallacy more than anythin...
Vitor Pamplona · 6d
Oh great.. all I wanted... More idiots selling shit we don't want.