Appeal to authority and false dichotomy fallacy.

Thank you for jour reply. This is a very interesting take. I had to look up some of your mentioned philosophies.

Every theory is merely an approximation of reality—or of truth itself. Bitcoin, for its part, is by far our best approximation for the exchange of value. Perhaps in other area as well.

Yet as like-minded individuals, we should test the theories we apply across all fields against Karl Popper’s standard of falsification. Only those we have not yet managed to refute should remain. It is through this gradual elimination of error that we draw closer to God and truth.

Einstein’s theory of relativity, however, falls into a category of theories I consider already logically refuted—as Run Ze Zao has demonstrated here.
But I'm just a dude who tries to find the truth in this world full of lies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz5ZJ75v5Qw

Hey Jack, I like your mindset and the way you connect the dots. You said one time that you adjust your thinking constantly and self reflect continuously. In my understanding of your content the theory of Relativity plays a important role.
In my little research I come to the conclusions that Einstein was a pervert and a fraud, the theory is complete bs only to explain away that the universe is geocentric. What is your take on this?

The "elite" physicists think it's geocentric
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeJb0JIHNik

Einstein is a fraud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeuNZJ9c6v0

I would buy it for sats but not with E-Mail requirement. You don't have a Bitcoin checkout.

Whats wrong with his thumb?

Dachte es ist etwas bitcoin spezifisches. Noch nicht mit home assistant beschäftigt. Danke für die info

Das sieht sehr elegant aus. Welche Software ist das?

Well said

I completely agree with you. My moral compass was given to me by God through my family and my intuition.

I also don't think there should be no leaders at all. In my opinion, each individual chooses their own leaders or not. A group of people should never impose a leader on an individual.
I am happy to follow a leader if they are worthy and have proven that they can solve problems morally and efficiently.

And if he no longer does it this way, I must have the right to say no.

My moral compass tells me that it is fundamentally wrong for a group of people to be able to determine the life and property of an individual through elections (or birthright, etc.) and enforce this with violence. I cannot provide any proofs for this. Probably no one can.

However, there are enough anecdotes from history, the principle of non-aggression, the golden rule...

The argument here is that the majority of today's problems can actually be traced back to the naivety of women.
The argument would be somewhat valid if history had shown that without women's suffrage, power-hungry, egomaniacal sociopaths would not have ruined society.

It distracts from the fact that voting on the property and life of another human being is fundamentally wrong, regardless of whether it is a woman or a man who votes. Men vote just as unfairly as women in other areas.