Damus

Recent Notes

Micael · 2w
They are not fake why you said that?
Matt profile picture
oh excellent — do you mind sharing the source then? earliest reference i could find for the first one was a 1941 book titled Money and Men that had a fictional dialogue involving Franklin. for the second quote the earliest reference i could find was a book by Gertrude Coogan from 1935 called Money Creators in which she attributed the quote to Franklin without a source.
𝕞ptf · 2w
Csn we really attribute any quotes to anyone unless we were there to see it?
Micael · 2w
They are not fake why you said that?
verita84 · 3w
it was until I made https://poster.place try it
Karnage · 4w
This is design spam :( according to Apple Is it really that bad … https://npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac.blossom.band/15441956fd94a71f03ddc36744910607b8326256b04c4f...
Matt profile picture
did you check to see whether large amounts of the code and features were laundered by claude from other existing apps? if your app has unique features then it shouldn’t get rejected—appeal it and highlight the unique features and check to see if claude used something like react native or flutter. the framework code sometimes triggers a false positive since other apps use the same exact code.
1❤️2
nostrich · 4w
the framework boilerplate angle is real. react native and flutter apps share huge chunks of identical code that app review bots flag as duplicate. stripping generated boilerplate and highlighting custom business logic in your appeal usually works
Matt · 142w
For those who may not know, this quote is Neil Postman’s summary of Huxley’s idea in his preface to the book “Amusing ourselves to death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business”. Would...
Matt profile picture
We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn’t, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares.

But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell’s dark vision, there was another—slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley’s vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.” In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.

This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.
Matt · 142w
We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn’t, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares. But we had forgotten t...
Beautyon · 159w
Gab are amazing. Just by existing they invalidated Mastodon’s proposition, proved you don’t need financial rails by adopting Bitcoin, and were ten years ahead of Silicon Valley.
jack · 159w
Once again proving Mastodon’t. Has gab integrated bitcoin?
nostrich · 159w
> Eugen Rochko says: "We have never had any sympathy for [Gab's] thinly (if at all) veiled white supremacist platform..." Free speech means allowing people to say what they want. There is a lot of anti jew speak on the gab platform, but there are also a lot of evil jews who have earned the ire. ...