@AlboreanNomad
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
We are now entering an era where the heat of battle blinds the bureaucrats and politicians. Just like the Gulf made the GAE's highest echelons turn a blind eye to China's rise, the risk of Sino supremacy across multiple fields creates an opportunity for the ambitious among us.
We engaged in succesfull resistance with the dollar pump on full capacity and the watchfull eye of the letter agencies.
Now is the time we can build the infrastructure for future sovereignty and growth. The world is too busy to care.
We engaged in succesfull resistance with the dollar pump on full capacity and the watchfull eye of the letter agencies.
Now is the time we can build the infrastructure for future sovereignty and growth. The world is too busy to care.
That's an interesting premise...how are these groups with higher TFR identified? Is there a book from which this theory originates?
This is based on research by Kaufmann. Any muslim group that sees the sharia as an important guideline, would make this group of sustainable TFR. That is the given part. Not every subgroup, however, has the potential to be included in elite formation. That would be the second part.
The book is:
Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth? Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century.
The book is:
Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth? Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century.
1👏1
Forgive my ignorance but what I understood is that new Muslims should have more kids away from their current environment and create new societies? is that what you mean?
No, I mean that community building efforts should concentrate on a few groups that already show much potential rather than try to "save" all nominal muslims. The higher TFR in these groups is already a given because they are more religiously conservative.
So, when trying to "islamize" a culture or create a new one, efforts should be directed towards these groups because the others will either be a drag or because their cultural footprint will be so small, that they are not too strong a competing force.
So, when trying to "islamize" a culture or create a new one, efforts should be directed towards these groups because the others will either be a drag or because their cultural footprint will be so small, that they are not too strong a competing force.
1
A world where total fertility rates (TFR) among the masses fall below replacement levels demands a shift in strategy for constructing new Islamicate cultures. Rather than striving to save or reform existing societies or cultures on a large scale, the focus should shift to ethnogenesis—the creation or emergence of new ethnic or cultural groups.
The "other" now effectively opts out of the future by limiting their cultural footprint in subsequent generations. Such stark differentiation among groups is unprecedented in this form. Historically, all cultural groups had comparable TFRs due to the inevitability of childbirth. Differences in reproduction rates were primarily linked to societal rank and wealth rather than divergent cultural codes.
This disparity in fertility today means that simply having four children allows a family to exert disproportionate influence on the cultural landscape of the future—especially when factoring in other means of cultural influence.
Strengthening groups that already align with a shared cultural framework is a more efficient strategy than attempting to reverse low TFR trends among the broader population or trying to convert others to our way of life.
Ambitious and capable elites, particularly those within the top 20% of society, are notably flexible in their loyalties. Their allegiance often shifts when they perceive a new group demonstrating vitality and a clear path to future dominance. This dynamic includes secular Muslims who lack strong ideological commitment to the prevailing liberal ideologies held by current ruling elites.
Such individuals will adapt and align themselves once they sense a shift in cultural and societal momentum. Therefore, a wise polity should prioritize empowering groups that exhibit promise and fit within the desired cultural framework. These groups will form the nucleus of a future elite, around which secular, nominal Muslims are likely to gravitate in due course.
The "other" now effectively opts out of the future by limiting their cultural footprint in subsequent generations. Such stark differentiation among groups is unprecedented in this form. Historically, all cultural groups had comparable TFRs due to the inevitability of childbirth. Differences in reproduction rates were primarily linked to societal rank and wealth rather than divergent cultural codes.
This disparity in fertility today means that simply having four children allows a family to exert disproportionate influence on the cultural landscape of the future—especially when factoring in other means of cultural influence.
Strengthening groups that already align with a shared cultural framework is a more efficient strategy than attempting to reverse low TFR trends among the broader population or trying to convert others to our way of life.
Ambitious and capable elites, particularly those within the top 20% of society, are notably flexible in their loyalties. Their allegiance often shifts when they perceive a new group demonstrating vitality and a clear path to future dominance. This dynamic includes secular Muslims who lack strong ideological commitment to the prevailing liberal ideologies held by current ruling elites.
Such individuals will adapt and align themselves once they sense a shift in cultural and societal momentum. Therefore, a wise polity should prioritize empowering groups that exhibit promise and fit within the desired cultural framework. These groups will form the nucleus of a future elite, around which secular, nominal Muslims are likely to gravitate in due course.
5❤️1❤️1🚀1🤙1