68 economists have come out of the woodwork calling for the ECB to launch a CBDC.
I guess this is a good reminder that just because a lot of people say something doesn’t mean it’s right.
This letter is particularly troubling, though. I say that because their argument lacks an understanding of both central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and economic history.
The economists claim that a CBDC like the digital euro would be “an essential safeguard of European sovereignty, stability, and resilience.”
https://sustainablefinancelab.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/506/2026/01/The-Digital-Euro-Let-te-public-interest-prevail.pdfSetting aside their lack of evidence to back the claim, where has this been true in practice?
It certainly isn’t true in The Bahamas.
https://www.cato.org/commentary/bahamians-didnt-want-cbdcs-so-now-theyre-being-forced-use-themIt certainly isn’t true in Jamaica.
https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/cbdc-lessons-caribbeanIt certainly isn’t true in Nigeria.
https://www.coindesk.com/opinion/2023/03/06/nigerians-rejection-of-their-cbdc-is-a-cautionary-tale-for-other-countriesDo I need to go on?
The CBDC experience varies country to country, but no CBDC has been “essential” in any sense of the word.
https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/homeYet, even within Europe’s borders, the economists appear to misunderstand economic history.
Pointing to the dominance of non-European financial institutions, the authors say the only defense is for the European government to intervene. Yet, interventions by the European government are partly why European businesses have struggled to gain ground.
https://www.cato.org/blog/europe-blames-america-its-payment-problems-digital-euro-wont-helpRather than being free to serve customers, European businesses must navigate a maze of red tape: customer-surveillance mandates, extensive reporting rules, and regulatory fragmentation.
Making matters worse, price controls—such as caps on interchange fees—prevent new entrants from generating the revenue needed to manage these compliance burdens. It’s not a market failure if the source of the issue is government intervention.
If the economists are right about one thing, it’s that the European Parliament should be careful about who it takes advice from.