Damus
clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’› profile picture
clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’›
@clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’›

Flawesome. GNU/Linux is my daily driver OS since 1995. On Fedi since 2008. Working in Racket, Tcl, Python, whatever gets the page up. Solving yesterday's problems tomorrow. A dad. Freddie Mercury is my spiritual advisor.

web.archive.org/web/1/pronoun.…

Every post of mine is an open invitation to advice or information or critique or disagreement unless I say otherwise. Fire away. If I don't appreciate your contribution, I'll let you know.

My soundcloud is hackerpublicradio.org/correspo… and my patreon is sfconservancy.org/donate/ .

I don't represent Software Freedom Conservancy in any way, I just like what they do with the money I give them.

Unless stated otherwise, all posts CC-by-SA 4.0 International, including any media authored by me included in the posts. Any media from elsewhere whatever terms their author specifies.

This is my main account.

This is not my final form.

Relays (1)
  • wss://relay.ditto.pub – read & write

Recent Notes

clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’› profile picture
I have a Swedish "mm" that means "yes" or "go on", but when I instinctively use it speaking English, people tend to interpret it as a "hmm?", like "sorry, what was that, I was thinking of Ancient Rome", basically the opposite of what it's supposed to signal.

Over the years, I have tried to get rid of it or, failing that, modify it to sound more affirmative, but to this day, I still have it, and it's still causing confusion.

If it sounds more like a Japanese "un", native English speakers and Cantonese English speakers read it correctly. I can do it with effort, but unless I catch myself, that's not how it comes out.

Basically, the Swedish rising tone "mm" sounds like a distracted question mark to people, but a falling tone "un" sounds like an affirmative full stop.
clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’› profile picture
I sometimes realize, in the middle of a git rebase, that something is annoying and I want to fix it.

What I would usually do is make a commit then and there, let the rebase continue, and then later I'll have to remember that I want to do another rebase to move that commit to the proper place in the commit tree.

But what if your ongoing git rebase is something big, like run a check on each commit and push them as they're verified? I don't want that fix on my PR, and I don't want to skip the rest of the side-effects in this rebase and then start over.
2
clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡­πŸ‡°πŸ’™πŸ’› · 1w
Now what I did was make the fix, run `git rebase --edit-todo`, add a `pick djejfj4746` (the commit sha) to the end of the rebase, then run `git reset --hard HEAD^` to pretend like nothing happened, and `git rebase --continue`. Don't remember things when the tool can remember it for you. #git #GitR...
Alex Schroeder · 1w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqnjzrf5yyyfwent50am07cl0anquqrtcce9qsvqv7lc7kvuu3h77qntdv6u I had just that situation recently and – I made a note in a paper notebook.