@laanwj
71A3B16735405025D447E8F274810B012346C9A6
Relays (5)
- wss://relay.damus.io/ – read
- wss://nos.lol/ – read
- wss://theforest.nostr1.com/ – write
- wss://nostr.wine/ – write
- wss://nostr.x0f.nl/ – read & write
Recent Notes
Where the hell is nostr:nprofile1qqsq4gu7tthengqq577mpdyezkxf90z25g8mvkf355ks2k67km0lwwqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezu7psvchx7un89uq3kamnwvaz7tm5dpjkvmmjv4ehgtnwdaehgu339e3k7mf0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tc...
there's nothing for me here—i didn't escape so much as drifted away
2❤️1🫂1
Yeah I thought it was common knowledge.
The whole last decade timeline mashed up go WTaF
that reminds me, Zooko tried to recruit me once, in the early days of Zcash
i think around the block size war or some other drama episode
he seemed like an okay guy, but told him that if i was done with bitcoin, i was also done with coins in general
i think around the block size war or some other drama episode
he seemed like an okay guy, but told him that if i was done with bitcoin, i was also done with coins in general
1🖖1🤙1
joinmarket still doesn't work with descriptor wallets in bitcoin core, and it's become kind of pressing that this is addressed
legacy wallets have been deprecated for a long time, and are very likely going to be removed in next major version of bitcoin core (29.0), there's migration functionality to upgrade old wallets but this won't help for the use of legacy RPC calls like "importmulti"
after that it will ofc. still be possible to use it with version 28.x, but it's kind of sad to see an important privacy tool fall behind like this
so in case anyone wants to give it a go:
https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/issues/1571
legacy wallets have been deprecated for a long time, and are very likely going to be removed in next major version of bitcoin core (29.0), there's migration functionality to upgrade old wallets but this won't help for the use of legacy RPC calls like "importmulti"
after that it will ofc. still be possible to use it with version 28.x, but it's kind of sad to see an important privacy tool fall behind like this
so in case anyone wants to give it a go:
https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/issues/1571
97❤️8👀3❤️2🤙1
There is definitely a narrative that nostr event should be permanent which I guess some relays enforce. Guess that's the most "delete" we can get😃
it's that kind of "everything must be permanent" blockchain mindset that held me back from even trying nostr for a long time
it makes sense for public declarations and publishing, but not for day to day private life social media stuff, and even less so for DMs
it makes sense for public declarations and publishing, but not for day to day private life social media stuff, and even less so for DMs
Built a (basic) CLI tool, https://github.com/f321x/nip04-wiper, seems like a bunch of relays ignore the delete request though.
neat script !
i don't see a specific reason why they'd ignore it, it looks correct to me
but i guess some relays are just really shitty about that
they'd ignore expiration tags for sure, too
i don't see a specific reason why they'd ignore it, it looks correct to me
but i guess some relays are just really shitty about that
they'd ignore expiration tags for sure, too
❤1
Is there a tool to request deletion for all sent nip4 dms? Asking for a friend😂
not that i know of, we should really be sending DMs with expiration tag set
1👀1👍1
Thank you for reading it :)
i'lll try to get to reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30595 soon
❤️1🤙1
i remember this kind of thing from the early days of bitcoin, people have real difficulty coping with a system where there's no company and organization in charge, or directly profiting from use
at some level many people just *can't* understand it, which means Bitcoin Core was a convenient target for all nasty complaints
one of the most persistent, hard issues was fighting scope creep in Bitcoin Core (and in the consensus code); yes, that you can do something with bitcoin doesn't mean it all has to be in that software, the onus of decentralization is to create an ecosystem, where everyone does their part, but no part is critical
(and a project with everything is unmaintainable anyhow; there's the tendency to push the burden on a few people, a kind of Omelas effect)
and the relentless nagging for me to be "more like a dictator" (remember Mike Hearn)... sigh, no that's not the kind of thing we're trying to do here: create a decentralized financial system, not a weird new government. the reason BSV appealed to quite a few people is that it had a central dictator, even if clearly a scam
eventually, things fell in their place, though even in bitcoin it's a continuing struggle... really want something to be done? great, take initiative yourself, help out one of the projects in some way or get people to help
at some level many people just *can't* understand it, which means Bitcoin Core was a convenient target for all nasty complaints
one of the most persistent, hard issues was fighting scope creep in Bitcoin Core (and in the consensus code); yes, that you can do something with bitcoin doesn't mean it all has to be in that software, the onus of decentralization is to create an ecosystem, where everyone does their part, but no part is critical
(and a project with everything is unmaintainable anyhow; there's the tendency to push the burden on a few people, a kind of Omelas effect)
and the relentless nagging for me to be "more like a dictator" (remember Mike Hearn)... sigh, no that's not the kind of thing we're trying to do here: create a decentralized financial system, not a weird new government. the reason BSV appealed to quite a few people is that it had a central dictator, even if clearly a scam
eventually, things fell in their place, though even in bitcoin it's a continuing struggle... really want something to be done? great, take initiative yourself, help out one of the projects in some way or get people to help
64❤️8🤙9❤️🔥1❤️1👀1👏1
attacking the internet archive should be counted as crime against humanity imo
68❤️12🤙8👌2❤️1👍1🔥1
release notes: naddr1qq8k...
torrent:
torrent:
511❤️20🤙13🚀3:fire:1🍺1👀1
No, it's not something specific to the early days. It's just the way things are, if you don't constantly stay on top of it. Software rarely ossifies; it atrophies. Can happen at any time, in any ecosy...
it doesn't help that there's a lot of nonsense innovation by tech companies to sell new software and hardware and vendor lock-in (how many UI frameworks do we really need?), so everything is always new in that sense, always needing to be ported to some new API or API version
with all that context drift, writing software is like building sand castles, unfortunately, i often wish it'd stop and some things would be standardized
with all that context drift, writing software is like building sand castles, unfortunately, i often wish it'd stop and some things would be standardized