Damus

Recent Notes

son of sam harris · 13h
Facommunazi collectivists rapidly decreased Russia's population by about 60 million. Decreased Germany's by more than ten million. Also eliminated a shit-ton of Poles. Decreased China by a whopping 10...
Bernard Marks profile picture
@son of sam harris @Zardoz
Lumping communism and national socialism together as the same thing shows a great lack of knowledge. Nearly all communist revolutions resulted in immediate population reductions followed by lackluster growth. National Socialism was a resurgence of aristocratic rule and resulted in a boom in population, culture, civilization, and technology.
son of sam harris · 14h
You should take a look at China and Russia's current population pyramids. If you think Europeans are a rapidly dying breed the chinks and the ruskies are more than trebly fscked. India is taking over...
Bernard Marks profile picture
@son of sam harris @Zardoz
Population growth is a long tail of governance. Both Russia and China are also affected by post-enlightenment thinking, namely communism.

Rather than comparing two contemporary countries, one should look at any and all (formerly) white nations over time and see the after effects of government. After liberal democracy was embraced in the West, our populations began falling. NatSoc Germany reversed that trend for ten years.

Most people, including myself, are idiots. Without good leadership to construct healthy societies that encourage family, people make big mistakes. Our official and extended government seems to be doing everything to discourage family building.
1
son of sam harris · 13h
Facommunazi collectivists rapidly decreased Russia's population by about 60 million. Decreased Germany's by more than ten million. Also eliminated a shit-ton of Poles. Decreased China by a whopping 100 million then made it hard as possible to repopulate. Then there's Cambodia's steep population decl...
Zardoz · 16h
I have to agree with you here. This is the problem. The aristocracy is and will always be the weak link. There are no "good" aristocrats. There are only various stages of corruption and degenera...
Bernard Marks profile picture
@Zardoz @son of sam harris
You can believe that thousands of years of history of hundreds of nations shows aristocracy wrong or that post-enlightenment thinking and government is somehow better. Look at population growth of our people as a solid measure of our progress.

1
son of sam harris · 14h
You should take a look at China and Russia's current population pyramids. If you think Europeans are a rapidly dying breed the chinks and the ruskies are more than trebly fscked. India is taking over and none of the prospective aristocratic collectivists ever mention that. Really weird.
son of sam harris · 17h
Not quite sure you know how this aristocracy thing properly works. 'good' aristocrats replace 'bad' aristocrats and the same shit just keep going around in circles. Very similar to the uniparty system we have in place now. Emperors, Kings and a motley crew of appointed head of states and their minio...
Zardoz · 19h
The aristocrats are always the weakest link. Their degeneracy always opens the door to the money lenders.
Bernard Marks profile picture
@Zardoz
Aristocracy means rule by the best. If those leaders are not noble and the best, they are not aristocrats.

In our education of history in the liberal west, the failings of monarchies is emphasized, but we need to recognize that for thousands of years and hundreds of nations, aristocratic governments were the norm. Far more success than failure came from aristocracy, but our liberal rulers want us to have a different worldview.
1
son of sam harris · 18h
Aristocrats gave us IM injections. Napoleon injected his entire army before sending them to Moscow which is why hardly any of them made it back. It wasn't disease, hunger or hypothermia that wiped out his army - it was aristocratic quack medicine.