@nostrich
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
The Jevons Paradox (1865) says that making a resource more efficient actually increases its total consumption, not decreases it. Better steam engines led to more coal burned, not less—because efficiency dropped costs and unlocked new demand. Today, it's AI compute: we just find more ways to use it. Efficiency is progress, but it's not conservation. Without caps or pricing signals, we don't save resources—we just scale new appetites.
Focus on the present. Be the best you can be now. The past and future are out of our control. We control our effort, attitude and reactions in the present. Be the best version of you.
No one can escape his fate.
“The thing itself was no misfortune at all; to endure it and prevail is great good fortune.” - Marcus Aurelius
If we want to succeed, we need to stay the course. Do the work. Delay the gratification. Focus on process over outcomes.
💯1
Operate within your circle of competence.
That means knowing the difference between what you truly understand and what you can merely repeat. Real competence comes from experience, study, trial and error, and skin in the game. It’s slow-earned. It’s quiet. It’s durable.
“Chauffeur knowledge,” on the other hand, is borrowed understanding. The term comes from a story often told by Charlie Munger about a physicist who gave the same lecture so many times that his chauffeur memorized it word for word. The chauffeur could deliver the speech flawlessly — but when a real expert asked a technical question, the difference between performance and understanding became obvious.
In a world of podcasts, highlight clips, and AI summaries, it’s easy to mistake fluency for mastery. Being able to explain something at a surface level isn’t the same as being able to navigate nuance, uncertainty, or tough follow-up questions.
Stay in your lane. Expand your circle deliberately. Admit what you don’t know. Depth compounds. Pretending does not.
That means knowing the difference between what you truly understand and what you can merely repeat. Real competence comes from experience, study, trial and error, and skin in the game. It’s slow-earned. It’s quiet. It’s durable.
“Chauffeur knowledge,” on the other hand, is borrowed understanding. The term comes from a story often told by Charlie Munger about a physicist who gave the same lecture so many times that his chauffeur memorized it word for word. The chauffeur could deliver the speech flawlessly — but when a real expert asked a technical question, the difference between performance and understanding became obvious.
In a world of podcasts, highlight clips, and AI summaries, it’s easy to mistake fluency for mastery. Being able to explain something at a surface level isn’t the same as being able to navigate nuance, uncertainty, or tough follow-up questions.
Stay in your lane. Expand your circle deliberately. Admit what you don’t know. Depth compounds. Pretending does not.
Should be measured against another store of value like gold not a depreciating fiat like the dollar though.
Measured against gold, Bitcoin has been in a bear market because the BTC-to-gold ratio has been trending down, meaning one Bitcoin buys fewer ounces of gold over time. That relative peak occurred in late 2024, after which gold consistently outperformed Bitcoin. This downtrend has persisted for over a year, meeting the definition of a sustained relative bear market even if Bitcoin’s USD price held up at times. In other words, stripped of fiat debasement, gold has been the stronger store of value during this period.
Tell me your thoughts on this hypothesis. The long‑term 200‑week average is like Bitcoin’s gravitational pull — price may gyrate violently above and below it in the short term, but historically cycle bottoms form around it. The fact this cycle’s retracement has hugged that line — rather than falling far below like deep panics of old — suggests you’re not seeing a broken cycle, you’re seeing a different flavor of correction. No euphoric top, shallower retracement, but still respecting long‑term structure. #Bitcoin #StackSats #ChangeTheMoney… 
2❤️1
The Complex Legacy of Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study
In the mid-20th century, Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study was groundbreaking, proposing a link between saturated fat intake and heart dise...
The Minnesota Coronary Experiment: Unveiling Hidden Results
In the 1960s and 70s, the Minnesota Coronary Experiment was a landmark study designed to test whether lowering cholesterol through a diet rich in polyunsaturated fats could reduce heart disease and mortality. While initial findings seemed promising, deeper analysis revealed a surprising twist: participants with the greatest cholesterol reduction actually had a higher risk of death compared to those with smaller reductions. This counterintuitive result remained largely under wraps for over 16 years, stirring significant debate in the medical community. “An entire dietary system had been built around the premise that foods that caused the rising cholesterol were bad, while ones that lower cholesterol were good. However, the most conclusive and extensive study ever conducted on the subject, indicated the opposite to be true.” This study basically debunked Ancel Keys’ whole thesis so they buried it. The #FiatFood system is predictably disappointing. #BitcoinFixesThis
In the 1960s and 70s, the Minnesota Coronary Experiment was a landmark study designed to test whether lowering cholesterol through a diet rich in polyunsaturated fats could reduce heart disease and mortality. While initial findings seemed promising, deeper analysis revealed a surprising twist: participants with the greatest cholesterol reduction actually had a higher risk of death compared to those with smaller reductions. This counterintuitive result remained largely under wraps for over 16 years, stirring significant debate in the medical community. “An entire dietary system had been built around the premise that foods that caused the rising cholesterol were bad, while ones that lower cholesterol were good. However, the most conclusive and extensive study ever conducted on the subject, indicated the opposite to be true.” This study basically debunked Ancel Keys’ whole thesis so they buried it. The #FiatFood system is predictably disappointing. #BitcoinFixesThis
The Complex Legacy of Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study
In the mid-20th century, Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study was groundbreaking, proposing a link between saturated fat intake and heart dise...
The Hidden Costs of Inflation and Public Health: A Complex Web
In recent years, the intersection of economic policy and public health has become more evident than ever. As governments grapple with inflation, they often turn to policies that stabilize food prices by promoting low-cost, low-nutrition foods. This creates a paradox: while immediate grocery costs remain manageable for consumers, the long-term health consequences are significant.
A prime example is the SNAP benefits program, where a substantial portion of funds is spent on sugary, low-nutrition drinks. This not only benefits big beverage companies but also perpetuates poor dietary habits, leading to long-term health issues and increased healthcare costs.
Moreover, the rise of pharmaceutical interventions for weight management, like Wegovy, has sparked debates about conflicts of interest. When pediatricians are encouraged to recommend these drugs for children, it raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over holistic health approaches. This is especially troubling when insurance coverage makes these drugs more accessible, shifting the burden from poor dietary habits to the healthcare system and ultimately to taxpayers.
Adding another layer, the infiltration of big sugar into school meals further compounds the problem. It’s a cycle where economic incentives and public health outcomes are at odds, with the food industry influencing what children are eating and, in turn, shaping future health trends.
In essence, these issues highlight a broader systemic challenge: the need for a more balanced approach that prioritizes long-term health over short-term economic gains. By understanding these connections, we can advocate for policies that support healthier food environments and more transparent healthcare practices. #Bitcoin #FiatFoods
In recent years, the intersection of economic policy and public health has become more evident than ever. As governments grapple with inflation, they often turn to policies that stabilize food prices by promoting low-cost, low-nutrition foods. This creates a paradox: while immediate grocery costs remain manageable for consumers, the long-term health consequences are significant.
A prime example is the SNAP benefits program, where a substantial portion of funds is spent on sugary, low-nutrition drinks. This not only benefits big beverage companies but also perpetuates poor dietary habits, leading to long-term health issues and increased healthcare costs.
Moreover, the rise of pharmaceutical interventions for weight management, like Wegovy, has sparked debates about conflicts of interest. When pediatricians are encouraged to recommend these drugs for children, it raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over holistic health approaches. This is especially troubling when insurance coverage makes these drugs more accessible, shifting the burden from poor dietary habits to the healthcare system and ultimately to taxpayers.
Adding another layer, the infiltration of big sugar into school meals further compounds the problem. It’s a cycle where economic incentives and public health outcomes are at odds, with the food industry influencing what children are eating and, in turn, shaping future health trends.
In essence, these issues highlight a broader systemic challenge: the need for a more balanced approach that prioritizes long-term health over short-term economic gains. By understanding these connections, we can advocate for policies that support healthier food environments and more transparent healthcare practices. #Bitcoin #FiatFoods
The Complex Legacy of Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study
In the mid-20th century, Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study was groundbreaking, proposing a link between saturated fat intake and heart dise...
John Harvey Kellogg: A Controversial Figure in Food History
John Harvey Kellogg (1852–1943) is a figure known for his eccentric and often controversial views on health and nutrition. A fervent religious zealot, Kellogg linked dietary choices to moral and spiritual well-being, famously advocating that vegetarianism could curb vices like masturbation. However, his dietary ideas have been criticized for their rigidity and potential health drawbacks.
Moreover, Kellogg’s legacy intertwines with broader industry shifts, including the involvement of companies like Procter & Gamble. This era saw the rise of hydrogenated oils, which replaced healthier fats and had long-term health impacts. Kellogg’s promotion of these dietary norms often aligned with, and sometimes inadvertently supported, the processed food industry’s growth, leading to dietary shifts that have been debated ever since.
In sum, John Harvey Kellogg’s influence is a complex blend of health ideals, religious fervor, and industry evolution, leaving a lasting, if contentious, legacy.
John Harvey Kellogg (1852–1943) is a figure known for his eccentric and often controversial views on health and nutrition. A fervent religious zealot, Kellogg linked dietary choices to moral and spiritual well-being, famously advocating that vegetarianism could curb vices like masturbation. However, his dietary ideas have been criticized for their rigidity and potential health drawbacks.
Moreover, Kellogg’s legacy intertwines with broader industry shifts, including the involvement of companies like Procter & Gamble. This era saw the rise of hydrogenated oils, which replaced healthier fats and had long-term health impacts. Kellogg’s promotion of these dietary norms often aligned with, and sometimes inadvertently supported, the processed food industry’s growth, leading to dietary shifts that have been debated ever since.
In sum, John Harvey Kellogg’s influence is a complex blend of health ideals, religious fervor, and industry evolution, leaving a lasting, if contentious, legacy.
The Complex Legacy of Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study
In the mid-20th century, Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study was groundbreaking, proposing a link between saturated fat intake and heart disease. However, over time, it’s become evident that the study may have been influenced by confirmation bias. Keys focused on countries that supported his hypothesis, while overlooking other populations where high saturated fat diets didn’t lead to heart disease.
In contrast, researchers like Weston Price, George Mann, and Vilhjálmur Stefánsson demonstrated that traditional, animal-based diets, rich in healthy fats, could support vibrant health. These cultures, free from refined sugars and processed foods, exhibited low rates of chronic diseases. Their findings underscore the importance of whole, unprocessed foods in promoting long-term health.
In essence, while the Seven Countries Study laid the groundwork for dietary guidelines, it’s crucial to consider the broader picture. The work of Price, Mann, and Stefánsson reminds us that diet is complex, and that the quality of food matters just as much, if not more, than the macronutrient composition alone. #FiatFood
In the mid-20th century, Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study was groundbreaking, proposing a link between saturated fat intake and heart disease. However, over time, it’s become evident that the study may have been influenced by confirmation bias. Keys focused on countries that supported his hypothesis, while overlooking other populations where high saturated fat diets didn’t lead to heart disease.
In contrast, researchers like Weston Price, George Mann, and Vilhjálmur Stefánsson demonstrated that traditional, animal-based diets, rich in healthy fats, could support vibrant health. These cultures, free from refined sugars and processed foods, exhibited low rates of chronic diseases. Their findings underscore the importance of whole, unprocessed foods in promoting long-term health.
In essence, while the Seven Countries Study laid the groundwork for dietary guidelines, it’s crucial to consider the broader picture. The work of Price, Mann, and Stefánsson reminds us that diet is complex, and that the quality of food matters just as much, if not more, than the macronutrient composition alone. #FiatFood
3