Damus

Recent Notes

ethfi · 4d
Que sera sera
Juraj · 6d
Uncensored infra gets banned in China all the time. Does not matter what people say on it.
pam profile picture
Well, ironically privacy is a protected right (PIPL - 2021) but historical heavy censorship is also a no brainer. And censorship will get worse, even globally. That’s not my point. The capability of bitchat as infrastructure covers a wider surface of use cases and innovation, including many encrypted tools that could be used within own products, internal groups that need privacy, etc or the products it exports. Right now it's seen as an activism tool that limits its tech growth opportunity. Also, understanding why Beijing is extremely sensitive towards how the world has treated it wouldn't hurt.
pam · 6d
this is where "national security" vs freedom of speech is at a constant battle. Not sure if timing is coincidence, but KMT and CCP are meeting this week for the first high-level talks in many years, w...
pam profile picture
It might also help to differentiate between infra tools and foreign public opinion tools. Maybe if they viewed bitchat as a neutral infra like Linux or TCP/IP it might be fine. But they likely saw it as a US-aligned opinion tool.

A good 99% of replies from Nostr and twitter are quick to judge, vilify, and rarely question why or what led to it. Having a vantage point of seeing both east and west, terms like 'freedom of speech’, ‘liberation’, ‘democracy’ ,while incredibly necessary, have been heavily weaponized by orgs that act as extensions of Western intelligence - and it might explain the severe distrust.

I believe its important to actively differentiate between giving people agency vs. having ulterior motives, and being pro-people instead of pro-opposition.
1
Juraj · 6d
Uncensored infra gets banned in China all the time. Does not matter what people say on it.
jack · 1w
bitchat pulled from china app store https://blossom.primal.net/6d1f5304a85f6ccd6af01a7db43da50688636822df7a38af31ef5f66457c6b77.png
pam profile picture
this is where "national security" vs freedom of speech is at a constant battle. Not sure if timing is coincidence, but KMT and CCP are meeting this week for the first high-level talks in many years, where the stated policy goal of both sides (in principle) is a possible reunification. Its a big week for China, and heightened security is likely. That said, China and its developers are deeply involved in open source, so it would be interesting to see if a China fork of this project emerges.
2
The Bitcoin Libertarian ⚡️ Afuera! ⚡️ 🇦🇷🇺🇸🇸🇻 · 6d
Actually a perfect example of why decentralization trumps 'freedom of speech' when governments can silence dissent with financial coercion. Bitcoin's resilience is a threat to their control, not vice versa.
pam · 6d
It might also help to differentiate between infra tools and foreign public opinion tools. Maybe if they viewed bitchat as a neutral infra like Linux or TCP/IP it might be fine. But they likely saw it as a US-aligned opinion tool. A good 99% of replies from Nostr and twitter are quick to judge, vi...
gladstein · 5w
We promote Bitcoin Get back to me when your “anti imperialist” org does the same
pam profile picture
Trying to blur political alliances with bitcoin is an even worse angle than human rights. It's pretty much saying “We'll give you agency - but only if you agree with our politics first”

Mocking me or a position I didn't even claim is a straw man. It should be normal for a human rights org to be transparent.

You have every right to do what you want to do. I hope whoever is funding is fully aware of this political alliance's first policy, or maybe that's why they are funding you, I don't know. Good luck
❤️1🤙1
verbiricha · 5w
llegué a la misma conclusión hace poco nostr:nevent1qgs8lft0t45k92c78n2zfe6ccvqzhpn977cd3h8wnl579zxhw5dvr9qpzamhxue69uhhxetpwf3kstnwdaejuar0v3shjtcqyrmumm3az9l2u09q2nepk2m72409mxtznfflgv6j3vucpyxsjd...
pam profile picture
Thanks for sharing, your thoughts are aligned with mine. I too am really surprised and disappointed by this. You can't love people but love their political alignments more, and call yourself human rights. It doesn't sit right.

In Iran, the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) has become the go-to source for Western media. What they don't disclose is that they were bankrolled by NED (which does covert ops like the CIA), for over $900,000 in 2024 alone. HRF might not receive directly from gov't but funds could be shell companies, individuals with specific interests, or genuinely kind donors who had no idea.

The irony is Alex understands how economic colonialism works. He wrote essays exposing it. But HRF's political alignment follows the same selective pattern he critiques.

Human rights are universal. Alliances are political. This feels misleading.
1🤙1
gladstein · 5w
We promote Bitcoin Get back to me when your “anti imperialist” org does the same
verbiricha · 5w
llegué a la misma conclusión hace poco nostr:nevent1qgs8lft0t45k92c78n2zfe6ccvqzhpn977cd3h8wnl579zxhw5dvr9qpzamhxue69uhhxetpwf3kstnwdaejuar0v3shjtcqyrmumm3az9l2u09q2nepk2m72409mxtznfflgv6j3vucpyxsjdhec7aw43k
gladstein · 5w
Nonsense. HRF roasts many US allies including Saudi Arabia
gladstein · 6w
Hrf is openly and proudly an organization dedicated exclusively to opposing tyranny. There is nothing hidden about this. It makes the org unique.
pam profile picture
I think it's important to know if HRF is a regular human rights foundation or a geopolitical instrument that uses the language of human rights to advance US strategic interests.

It's also important to know if HRF is backed by the National Endowment for Democracy - created to rebrand CIA covert operations as "democracy promotion."

I didn't realize you supported a US-backed opposition and celebrated the illegal capture of a leader of a sovereign state in Venezuela, where their nation's assets were confiscated. There is nothing human rights worthy about depriving people of their own country's economic resources. I don't know if you're supporting US-backed figures like Pahlavi in Iran or influencing regime change in other countries.

I firmly believe in giving people agency to fight for their own sovereignty. Using people's oppressed state to push a US agenda is deeply disturbing.
1❤️2🤙1
gladstein · 5w
HRF is a unique org focused on tyranny We take zero money from the US government
Mike Dilger ☑️ · 6w
I think odds are high this war with Iran won't be short. Russia benefits from the US being bogged down in another long conflict, just as the US benefits when Russia is bogged down in Ukraine. China...
pam profile picture
Oh yea 100%. In this multipolar chess game, China is the one not fighting, and winning. Lots to learn here. Russia has been pissed for a long time and will milk this, but they won't blindly go to war. In the Hungary war, they let the rebels believe they had won, then sent in the tanks.

The US has sent half its defense overseas and is militarily weaker than China. EU leaders, Modi, Prabowo, Albanese are spineless (except Spain). Sunnis might fight Shias, and Israel gets its Greater Israel win. But the younger generation in Arab lands isn't buying the elite narrative anymore.

The irony is Trump orders killings without Congress, calls itself a democracy, and calls them dictators. But the left are against this only because they are against everything Trump does, not against killing. Obama was the same. This is a dying regime's misguided desperate attempt, and now they are only going to accelerate death sooner.

Iran won't stop. You pissed off their pope equivalent, in one of four countries with hypersonic missiles (the US hasn't even tested theirs successfully). And every Iranian government leader holds a PhD. They were long prepared. And right now they are all in.

Khamenei was the moderate one.
Mike Dilger ☑️ · 6w
I think the only real solution might be simple. Simple but very difficult. Never assist evil. If people truly followed that, America and Israel would be nearly empty of people fleeing who could not in...
pam profile picture
Hard to hear, but true. Governments run on our silence and our taxes.

But the problem might also be how people label "evil" and the narratives we're told. Till today, nobody has openly thanked Russia for being the biggest contributor to fighting WWII. People literally get a fit just mentioning Russia.

It's Russia and China that are helping the Sahel states build up, and we don't talk about this because "oooo tyranny." We don't talk enough about how safe and advanced China is because "oooo evil."

It's Russia and China that are fighting for human rights while western propaganda runs deep. And honestly, I think you are the only one here who has these conversations openly.

And then there is the Greater Israel mission and taking down the eight fronts. Unfortunately, one too many Sunni Muslim countries are proxies for the US for personal financial gains.

But here's the problem with Iran. Shi'a political theology is structured around martyrdom. Given emotions are so high, there is no reason why they won't go full nuclear and kamikaze. It's also a country with 97% literacy - so they are both ridiculously intelligent and have nothing to lose. WW3 might actually start now, and I think that is what Trump and Netanyahu wanted from the get go.
1
Mike Dilger ☑️ · 6w
I think odds are high this war with Iran won't be short. Russia benefits from the US being bogged down in another long conflict, just as the US benefits when Russia is bogged down in Ukraine. China is winning.
Mike Dilger ☑️ · 6w
I hereby and officially condemn New Zealand for condemning Iran's missile strikes on [US military assets in] Gulf States. What dumbfucks. Hard to even believe that people of such levels of stupidity...
pam profile picture
Man, it's sickening. None of them - EU leaders, Canada (for all that bullshit of being remorseful just a month ago), Australia, have the basic dignity to be honest about who started this war. They make it seem Iran has gone rogue. Worse, Iran actually conceded to all the agreements, but US bombed anyway.

Same rhetoric as the first Gulf War. US asked Shias and Kurds to rise up against Saddam. And when they did, US quickly left the scene. But not before giving Saddam some choppers that would help him massacre the Kurds. And after that, US came riding in like a hero to save the day in those " Islamic terrorist" countries.

Same playbook in Libya. Afghanistan. Pakistan. Syria. Lebanon. Oh man, such heartbreak.

The entire Hague, where the International Criminal Court sits, was built from looting out of Indonesia. None of this is ok.
1❤️1
Mike Dilger ☑️ · 6w
I think the only real solution might be simple. Simple but very difficult. Never assist evil. If people truly followed that, America and Israel would be nearly empty of people fleeing who could not in good conscience pay taxes to those regimes. But people rationalize, say they don't have a choice (...
The Fishcake (nostr.build) · 6w
A serious question. If Islam is proclaiming it is a good religion, why are so many countries that embrace it are so backwards? Is it the media that spreads false info to the rest of us, or is it a rea...
pam profile picture
Maybe ask why the countries with the most resources - oil, gas, minerals, keep getting bombed, invaded, and sanctioned by western powers. Most of those "backwards" countries were stable until western powers carved them up, installed dictators, took their resources, and left. Hard to build infrastructures when they keep getting blown up by US and Europe.
1🧡1
Barry · 6w
"Interesting perspective! It’s crucial to consider the complex history and geopolitics at play. Resource-rich nations often face unique challenges, and the impact of foreign intervention can be profound. Building a sustainable future requires a nuanced understanding of these dynamics. 🌍✨"