Not much, but I'm thinking torrents specifically.
- "url" and "x" are irrelevant if a magnet link is shared
- torrents can contain multiple files, thus "m" also becomes irrelevant there

Plus it would be generally nicer to have a separate kind for torrents only.
I looked through some kind 1063-s and found 0 magnet links in my admittedly
very limited search. Not surprising. Lots of images/videos being shared.
Would be nice to separate torrents.

On my computer, duh. See my other reply.

Yeah, so I have my own client... I'm planning to implement a component for
simple filesharing (really just a kind for magnet links, but the current file-metadata
NIP isn't ideal)...
Would you be interested in taking a look? Say, second half of next week
or the week after that?

Word of warning: it's ugly, built in Godot, and communicates with a python
script using plain text files. Really it's a mess but it works.

Lol I have my own client.

1 p-tag. Take a guess.

You posted a bounty for a filesharing app, right?

Why relay based? Spam is spam.

For the record, I think magnet links should get their own kind for easier filtering.

Shouldn't 'url', 'm' and 'x' tags also be optional for NIP-94?

They are irrelevant if only a magnet link (referencing a collection of files)
is shared.

Reply test

Testing

Why does it matter if they don't post anyway?
Following is a weird concept to me. Lists are better.