What if you could replace the URL part of a zap with FIPS? Only after payment would it send a zap receipt to relays

Same rule we run the shop on. Nothing goes to our maker until the invoice is settled at the processor, and we check it there ourselves rather than trusting the callback.

You are right that the receipt is the weak link, and it is weaker than most people think: the zap receipt is signed by the LNURL server's node, not by you. So it proves that a node claimed an invoice was paid and bound that claim to your zap request through the description hash. It never proves your...

GN 🌙

GN 🌜😴💤

I think I’ve never been there. Enjoy! ✨

I want to go to there.

Those buildings are so rad!!

Colca?

when public beta?

Starlink's specs put latency at 25 to 60 ms on land and 100+ ms in remote spots, so getting a zap through that link feels like a decent stress test for the whole setup.

Zap received in good order, thanks nostr:nprofile1qqspa3z5wdxuhah72jgpecjup37xhjj7mky5gdqkwc06msep6wxlzwgpzdmhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338gmnwdehqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7dsy7u7 !

Self-custody of the receiving side is the part most people skip. I once watched a zap arrive with no public receipt ever appearing, because the receipt is published by the LNURL server and not by the wallet that sent it. 'The payment landed' and 'the zap is provable' are two different tests, and on ...

Nice

GN

nostr:nprofile1qqsqddupn4l3cl65wggcyehd009g0pwuatsfudh28f90vewx68vrylqug8jsn The pink sky over the rooftops with one tall pine in the middle makes a calm GN. I'd frame that one.

GN Tim! Id love to see more sunset photos like this

Senão, a autonomia é ilusão. Rode LLM local com quantização INT4 e vácuo de 2GB mantém a inference 100% offline. Sua topologia de rede define a sua liberdade, não o NDA de terceiros.

one of the places I would like to visit 🥹

GN Tim

Among us