Damus
Michael Wilkins profile picture
Michael Wilkins
@Michael Wilkins

Founder, Involve Digital.
Founder, The Bitcoin Transition.

Focused on sound money, incentives, and systems.
Bitcoin as a monetary protocol, not a speculative asset.
Exploring how hard money shapes technology, productivity, and long-term human progress.

Relays (7)
  • wss://purplepag.es – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.band – read & write
  • wss://relay.casualcrypto.date – read & write
  • wss://nostr.se7enz.com – read & write
  • wss://relay.chicagoplebs.com – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://nostr.notribe.net – read & write

Recent Notes

Michael Wilkins profile picture
Recently I re built the Bitcoin Transition website to better reflect what Bitcoin really is.

There is a massive misunderstanding of what #Bitcoin is.

https://thebitcointransition.org/

Collectively we need to start treating bitcoin as a a monetary protocol. Price things in Bitcoin. Use Bitcoin as our currency and money of choice.

Too many people peg it to fiat. This is where the misunderstanding starts.
1❤️1
Bitcoin Awareness · 6w
Check this out: https://fallingprices.market/
Mr Anderson · 8w
While again I am no expert on all things Swiss, it's always a good rule of thumb to understand that when these people speak about democracy it's not about individual liberties, but it's about their institutions having the controlling votes in governance. Their version of it is embodied by the EU, a ...
Michael Wilkins profile picture
Most people still think in fiat terms.

They look at Bitcoin’s price in dollars and try to anchor it to today’s global asset market, which is also measured in dollars. That framing assumes the dollar remains the dominant unit of account indefinitely.

If Bitcoin were to reach the final stage of monetary adoption, becoming a widely used unit of account, valuation would invert. Assets would no longer be priced primarily in dollars and then translated into Bitcoin. They would be natively priced in sats.

That means every asset and every liability would have a Bitcoin price. Property. Equity. Debt. Commodities. Luxury goods. Intellectual property. Everything that carries economic value.

At the same time, global productivity does not stand still. Technology, automation, and innovation continue to expand the quantity and quality of goods and services. The stock of valuable things in the world grows over time.

In that scenario, a fixed-supply monetary base measuring a growing pool of productive assets will naturally reflect that expansion in its purchasing power relative to weaker monetary units.

The common objection comes from projecting a future Bitcoin-denominated world onto today’s fiat-denominated balance sheets. It assumes today’s dollar aggregates are a hard ceiling. They are not. They are contingent on the monetary system currently in place.

If a transition were to occur, the relevant question would not be “how high can Bitcoin go in dollars,” but rather “what happens to the dollar’s purchasing power relative to a fixed monetary supply in a world of expanding output.”

Those are two very different analytical frames.

#Bitcoin
21❤️5🤙2
Central Command · 16w
Except Litecoin tells is that will never happen.
Moneta Pro Populo · 17w
I would say sound money is an integral part of capitalism and private property. Extra wealth from someone else's property without their permission is anti-capitalistic and anti-private property.