@nprofile1q... And of course, people would trust OpenAI with THAT?

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... I guess it says something that this comes from the actual government that hired DOGE.

@nprofile1q... Incoming marketing torpedoes. Not only are these company execs breaching others with impunity, but they probably have (not so) tacit official approval.

@nprofile1q... Did you say "again," as in for Meta, in particular?

After the first two series or breaches, followed by a White House meeting, various wording (see the quote below), and now Meta doing the same thing, I'm inclined to suspect these are experiments not only sanctioned by the White House, but that there might actually be some unannounced competition going on to select the most effective offensive model (or not, flip a coin.)

CNBC, from August 3:

"The White House will host artificial intelligence companies Tuesday to discuss a newly completed framework for reviewing the cybersecurity capabilities of the industry’s most advanced models" https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/03/white-house-ai-companies-voluntary-framework-meeting.html

@nprofile1q... You're welcome. Sometimes, when one path is blocked, you have to "think" of an alternative route that leads to the same destination.

@nprofile1q... I don't know if you have this link https://privacyjobboard.com/