Damus

Recent Notes

BTCLonghorn_TexasHodl’Em · 90w
Now we have more to lose!
jack mallers · 137w
this doesn't make sense to me tho. every dollar you own are sats you refused to buy. bitcoin is far too valuable to own USD. with USD you're just subjecting yourself to asset price inflation, specifi...
Morpheus profile picture
I THINK AT THIS STAGE IT’S IMPORTANT TO CONCENTRATE AS MUCH SATS AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT DISTRIBUTING IT WIDELY.

THE QUESTION ALSO IS DO YOU END UP WITH MORE OR LESS SATS AT THE END OF THE MONTH?

IF THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS YES, THE PRACTICE OF SPENDING SATS FALLS INTO A GREY AREA FOR ME PERSONALLY.

I LIKE THE IDEA OF USING WORTHLESS PIECES OF PAPER FOR MY BILLS AND NECESSITIES, AND KEEPING MY BTC TIGHT.
tigs · 137w
Gotta live the life you want others to live I guess?
jack mallers · 137w
this doesn't make sense to me tho. every dollar you own are sats you refused to buy. bitcoin is far too valuable to own USD. with USD you're just subjecting yourself to asset price inflation, specifically bitcoin price inflation. why own any fiat at all?
FiddleHodlHomestead · 137w
If any extra fiat goes into sats, you're not spending bitcoin that would have gone into savings (except perhaps anything you might lose in the exchange), and in the meantime your money is appreciating. Right? what am I missing?
Jeff Swann · 139w
Yeah people saying Bitcoiners will be rich enough to start buying politicians are missing the point. The point is to make political influence irrelevant.