Damus

Recent Notes

Dikaios1517 · 3w
I haven't read the PCA's report on Christian Nationalism. I heard it was more balanced than that. Did it actually condemn all forms of nationalism? I can't speak for what other denominations had for...
Mike Maruska profile picture
Appreciate the interaction and push back. To clarify, I'm not in a NAPARC church, but interact with others who are. I also don't have you or Freeborn in mind in my comments.

I'm sure there is much in the opc docs that i would amen. But there is a difference between being justified in Christ and the reality of nature. There is no male or female(justification) does not erase hierarchy or differences which God created.

My point is that resolutions like the ARP seem performative in a lot of cases. It strikes me at times as men worrying about the flood and forgetting the house is on fire(lewis). I really don't mean to start some big issue, and it would certainly be better hashed out over a good stout. I simply want to see churches stand up to the real dangers of our day. Which I am sure you desire as well despite our differences.

1
Dikaios1517 · 3w
I agree that these things are generally better hashed out over a good stout. Barring that, I hope I can continue to charitably interact with your concerns. For some context, I am an elder in an OPC church in North Idaho. That doxxes me to some extent, but it’s nothing I haven’t mentioned here...
freeborn | ἐλεύθερος | 8r0gwg · 3w
Helpful: https://heidelblog.net/2026/06/urcna-synod-calgary-2026-a-retrospective/ https://heidelblog.net/2026/06/arp-2026-synod-recap/ https://heidelblog.net/2026/06/a-retrospective-of-the-2026-opc...
Mike Maruska profile picture
The trouble is that some of these NAPARC men don't actually seem to know what time it is. They're more concerned with mean tweets than the issues people actually face. The PCA overlooks things like women officers, and Side B, but condemns any form of nationalism as if that is the worst thing we're dealing with.

Race, immigration, egalitarianism and homosexuality are the issues of our day and some of these resolutions are just grounded in liberal civil rights rather than the Bible. These are the things congregants face in their daily lives.
1
Dikaios1517 · 3w
I haven't read the PCA's report on Christian Nationalism. I heard it was more balanced than that. Did it actually condemn all forms of nationalism? I can't speak for what other denominations had for grounds for adopting the ARP's statement condemning racism, but I can give you the grounds used by ...
Mike Maruska profile picture
We live in a thoroughly fiat world. Take the world cup for example: In 1994 there were 24 teams. Then there were 32. And now this year there are 42!

More teams don't make the quality better but dilute it, just like printing money dilutes your wealth.

Fiat thinking infects more than your money.
MountainVicar · 4w
GM
Mike Maruska profile picture
Don't fall for dudes in hoodies or CEO's with AI slop rap videos. Stick to the fundamentals:

Not your keys not your coins.
Bitcoin not crypto.
Stay humble, stack sats.
❤️1
Turner · 5w
Nice. At this rate we’ll have a booth at a conference somewhere next year.
Sun of the Moon · 5w
Nobody tells Bitcoin what to do. Honeybadger don't play that!
Alfred · 4w
And yet here we are with entirely solid faces. Pretty much everyone was wrong! Staying humble though.
Laser · 27w
"Future goal would be a more open e-reader with physical book files." Sir read this and then GFY.
Debifi · 28w
Exchanging stables for fiat doesn't create a sell pressure on BTC. There are few reasons why borrowers choose to borrow with Debifi: 1) Have liquidity without losing the upside potential of bitcoin...
Mike Maruska profile picture
Thank you for the reply.

I understand the benefits. I understand not selling your btc. On paper it sounds great, and I really like the debifi model.

But getting shitcoins in return are less liquid than btc or cash. For example, if I want to use a loan to invest equipment in my business, I don't know of anyone in the real world wanting usdt, eth, or liquid(which is a pretty ironic name). At that point btc is actually more desirable or workable.

And as far as I can tell, if you want to take on shitcoins you have to go through another exchange. Which reintroduces kyc and potentially a tax liability. Am I wrong? I'm sincerely asking. If I didn't care, I'd go with strike or coinbase and have to turn over my keys to questionable actors with questionable motives and give up privacy.

I also realize that we are still early and these are growing pains. But this seems like a fear problem to solve.
Debifi · 28w
Your concern is valid. In most cases to swap out of stablecoins you will have to give up custody and provide your personal information. Good thing is that we have fiat offers available.