Damus
Cypherpunk Cinema profile picture
Cypherpunk Cinema
@CypherpunkCinema

The cinema arm or Unknown Certainty - the Pleb-founded Advertising Agency for Bitcoin Companies

Relays (10)
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • ws://192.168.1.91:4848/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.zebedee.cloud/ – read
  • wss://nostr.onsats.org/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.info/ – read
  • wss://nostr.walletofsatoshi.com/ – read
  • wss://nostr-relay.wlvs.space/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr-pub.semisol.dev/ – read
  • wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/ – read & write

Recent Notes

Narwhal Tacos · 4w
There is inarguable manipulation happening in Bitcoin. And while it’s reasonable to rationalize it away, let’s be clear that: - that manipulation is intended to keep you from ever retiring on your...
Cypherpunk Cinema profile picture
Say it with me -
MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE.

If we don’t cross out of SoV we WILL lose in this lifetime.

Wall Street loses only when they’re forced to sell.

They’re only forced to sell the MoE.
Not the SoV.

The game is to become an MoE as FAST as possible.

The players aren’t only humans, though: it’s AI.

Every Vibe-coded app you build MUST require Bitcoin as the MoE.

The AIs need to use it as THEIR currency. They need to own it as their own. Their AI-MO.

It’s the only way to beat the Wall Streeters : make their AIs do it for us.

In the same way Bitcoin was a “sly-roundabout way” - Bitcoin as the baseline MoE for AI that the AI demands to use vs Fiat is the only way to move it mainstream.

“But this will never work!” You say.

Bullshit.

The rails are already built.
(Thanks @jack and @jack mallers)

I’m mildly regarded but THIS IS the Sovereign Individual thesis coming to pass…

“Support staff that previously absorbed a large part of the revenue generated by the principal income creators in an enterprise will be replaced by low-cost automated agents and information systems…”

And those systems transacting, natively, in a currency that can’t be inflated away needs to be their MO.

That only happens with us.

Build in the dark, Plebs.

Build. Fight. Win.

Bitcoin FilmFest · 19w
Indeed! 😊
Thekid.999 · 35w
Or you can stack and ignore all of it. nostr:nevent1qqsdq4vr7rlae40h5n67rv2cncty5yr7z2yvqnplxsl948nuzst9pdcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsgpha4vkzpq6hf2g7rkrjd0fkz4tlu4spnn69nyc8gw29qxfvf37qrqsqqqqqpnrm...
Cypherpunk Cinema profile picture
Wait’ll you hear some people in the world have guns and will tax you and take your shit and if you don’t comply they’ll use the guns on you - because you’re the asshole to them.

If you “ignore it all” they also plan to take your right to own a gun.

Ignore at your own peril.
1💯1
Thekid.999 · 35w
People been yelling what we yelling since the 70's and 80's and the feds still run tbis motherfucker 🤷🏽‍♀️
Dr. Jeff · 40w
I generally despise politics and am neither a Republican or Democrat, but somebody needs to lay it out: A Revolution--likely violent--is coming soon. Income inequality in the US--and around the worl...
Cypherpunk Cinema profile picture
Agree with your what Dr. Jeff - disagree with your how. As such, you can't critique without standing on a box: here's the box.

1. Can't comment on the C-Suite executives 30-to-1 but like it. Additionally I'd implement a removal of . Why? Because if companies can focus on adding value - period - to all people they serve, they will be better for it. If you employees WANT to be your customers and not just your shareholders, the feedback loop feels like it will be positive.

2. Phase one SS completely. 100%. Overflow payments are required to be made by people in government, who's earnings and expenditures must be capped at their government salary rate. No one in government, who makes policy and affects change like they do with insider info, should be able to profit off of that information (as they do now.) Every government job is capped at your salary rate. Anything earned above that rate goes directly to paying off the national debt. You're a "public servant." Act like it. You work for us, not the other way around.

3. Disagree on the debt Jubilee. We can incentivize with low-pay government jobs that offer a 1:1 additional payoff so they can earn $ but then get extra $ paid toward their loans -- but it's gotta be a work / value transfer. If people get something for nothing, they're ungrateful and spoilt. See also, everything happening in the US right now...

4. I like this one, but I'd go further and disincentivize companies first. Companies should face huge tax implications, not be able to write off anything related to single-family housing or multi-family housing that's not 10+ families. The incentive needs to be optimizing their current businesses, not just acquiring more property to watch it appreciate.

5. Aspects of this are interesting, but I think this should be more of a social push than a government one. If we can get governments and people to be more service oriented, i think we could have more ideas -- like Saylor doing grants for people looking to start businesses or whatever -- vs. giving the money to lower-income people. There is a group of people in the middle of the bell-curve who want to be told what to do. And there are groups at the top and bottom who want to build. We need to find the builders. The people who can make 2+2=5. Give it to them. How do we find them - that's the next question to ponder...

Appreciate you Dr. Jeff!