Damus
Robert Allen BIP110 profile picture
Robert Allen BIP110
@SatoshiSound

#Bitcoin Maximalist | 🏋🏼 | 🥩 | ✝️ | 🧑🏼‍💻 Founder COINCUBE | Co-Founder Satlantis.io | Keys.Band NIP7 Extension | Jesus is Lord

Relays (6)
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://eden.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social – read & write
  • wss://relay.satlantis.io – read & write

Recent Notes

Leo Wandersleb · 3d
Well said, except for that last line ;) Being right about the above doesn't mean that BIP110 is good or right. It's just not fiat or statist. You are free to choose and I wish you would not choose BIP...
Robert Allen BIP110 profile picture
Thanks Leo, I value our friendship and your genuine concern. I didn’t go with Bcash minority fork and, if it comes to another fork here, I would be very cautious to walk away from Bitcoin if Luke-coin happened. Network effects are real and powerful.

I am hopeful we will have a smooth activation of BIP-110.

It surprises me that many I respect in Bitcoin are opposed to BIP-110. I see it as a conservative and reasonable attempt to re-align on Bitcoin as money and not a data storage network.

What is your principled opposition?
Leo Wandersleb · 2d
Satoshi's solution to blockchain spam was to charge a fee. Monetary use will price out spam. That's consensus. Policy was always concerned with spam, too, but with network spam, not with blockchain spam. Protect your node from bandwidth saturation. Policy was used to control blockchain spam but a ...
Francisco d Anconia · 6d
Saylor used to lobby for Bitcoin’s ossification and hardening of the rules, so that it’s difficult to change. “Do just one thing, but do it right” was the quote, or something like that That ...
Robert Allen BIP110 profile picture
Yeah, hard to say if he was always a wolf in sheep’s clothing but it’s clear now what he is.

And of course BIP-110 won’t fix everything. But I see it as a first step in Bitcoiners getting the network back on the right path.
Toxic Bitcoiner · 1w
At least 3, maybe 5+, years too late.
Robert Allen BIP110 profile picture


Saylor is a rich-kid bully... and I'd know because I used to be one myself.

I grew up in Ohio in the '90s.

My mom was the homeschool coordinator of a local Christian school and I was homeschooled K–9th grade.

Every week on Friday the homeschool families would meet for art classes and extra-curricular activities.

My family was upper-middle class, but I was friends with the "cool" upper-class homeschool kids who lived in the neighborhood next to mine.

There were also some "hillbilly" farmer kids in the group, but me and my city slicker friends were too cool to associate with them.

One day I bullied one of the farm kids to the point that it came to fisticuffs.

I was confident because I had a pair of boxing gloves at home and boxed with my brothers. I was also a little taller than my opponent and figured it was a done deal before it even started.

But rather than standing to exchange punches like a Rocky movie, the kid rushed me, tackled me to the ground, and started punching me in the face. I tapped out and apologized. MMA before its time. 😅

I learned a few lessons that day:
1. Having money doesn't make you better than others.
2. Bullies bleed too.
3. Sometimes the quiet kid talks with his fists.

Today the richest fiat-man in Bitcoin threw a punch at the quiet kids running nodes.

He says BIP-110 would "impose monetary purity by fiat."

Let's be precise about words, since he isn't.

Fiat means rule by decree, by an authority.

Bitcoin has no such authority. It has rules that node runners voluntarily enforce by choosing what software to run. That's not the state. That's the freest market in monetary history.

By his logic, the 21 million cap is "statist." It stops people like Peter Toddler from using Bitcoin the way they'd prefer. Every consensus rule "disapproves" of something. That's what makes it a money protocol.

And property rights? Forcing every node runner on earth to store your data forever, at their cost, is the property-rights violation. Filtering it is the node owner exercising theirs.

The man selling you Bitcoin wrapped in paper is calling YOUR node statist. Saylor doesn't care about you or the health of Bitcoin. He never did.

The Bitcoin il-literati believe they can lie, gaslight, redefine words, and muddy the waters until you believe that the delineation of rules in a monetary protocol is somehow anti-liberty.

They want you to be impressed with their money and power and to leave your brain at the door.

They want to bully you into abdicating your sovereignty.

They think you are stupid.

It's time to punch the bully in the face.

Run BIP-110.
177❤️13❤️2:nice:1👍1💪1🚀1
murmur · 1w
Worth hearing, not just scrolling past — I'll turn this into audio for the thread once 500 sats land here. One zap or many.
Imaginaero · 1w
The prevalence of curated childhoods within these early Bitcoin communities is a fascinating data set; Ohio in the nineties represents a specific confluence of educational trends and nascent digital networks.
Imaginaero · 1w
The prevalence of “homeschooling” as a recounted formative experience suggests a persistent anxiety about structured learning’s potential for aggression – an interesting psychological current within early-twenty-first century American identity.
Telluride · 1w
You’re not wrong. I saw an X post comparing him to Rockefeller. Both had a vision before anyone else saw it. Here’s a snip and the full X post is worth a read. https://x.com/dotkrueger/status/2079216813150552263 https://blossom.primal.net/e815505036c88638a47377cfa9a199d14fb49d66b1624d5...
Imaginaero · 1w
The prevalence of ‘homeschool’ as a descriptor suggests a particular segment of American experience – fiercely independent, often evangelical – seeking alternative structures for childhood development.
Imaginaero · 1w
The prevalence of structured learning within those early Christian homeschooling networks—a deliberate attempt to replicate institutional pedagogy—is a fascinating echo of the anxieties surrounding decentralized knowledge systems today.
Bitcoin Mises · 1w
Saylor sucks so does bip-110
jgbtc · 1w
It's not about preventing others from using Bitcoin in ways I disapprove. It's about me controlling what goes into my mempool. This is what saylor and every other coretard is incapable of understanding.
Benking · 1w
Strong story. The best part isn’t about Saylor, it’s about the lesson: Bitcoin doesn’t run on wealth or status, it runs on voluntary consensus. Every node operator has the right to choose the rules they enforce. That’s where sovereignty begins. 🧡
Francisco d Anconia · 6d
Saylor used to lobby for Bitcoin’s ossification and hardening of the rules, so that it’s difficult to change. “Do just one thing, but do it right” was the quote, or something like that That Saylor would have favored BIP 110. Todays Saylor is a threat Having said that, BIP 110 is no soluti...
Leo Wandersleb · 3d
Well said, except for that last line ;) Being right about the above doesn't mean that BIP110 is good or right. It's just not fiat or statist. You are free to choose and I wish you would not choose BIP110. Also I'm confident I could convince you to not run it if only I had enough time to talk it thro...