@nprofile1q... I would imagine it would all have to be redone now, or was enough AI stuff in view that it is managing? Because the current status of all Wikipedia visioning has to start from a readership graph that looks like print newspapers, except happening faster.

@nprofile1q... hrm, that's interesting and timely - I'd really like to see some design fiction work around Wikipedia.

@nprofile1q... I presume it had a mastodon sticker on the other side

@nprofile1q... yeah you’d want to do this more thoroughly across a range of topics, though I’m not sure how you’d do that analysis exactly.

But also I suspect that job seekers usually aren’t the ones reading these; with weird exceptions like Pope, probably it is more high school and college kids trying to understand a field?

@nprofile1q... knowledge that has no readers is not very interesting. And volunteer-created knowledge that has no readers quickly becomes knowledge that has no creators.

@nprofile1q... it’s a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tyranny_of_Structurelessness

@nprofile1q... yeah I’m very curious how “empowering more people to use APIs and migrate data” plays out in practice.

@nprofile1q... this originally started as “what would LLM-aided decision-making modeled after coop-y structures look like” and then spiraled very quickly and badly from there