Oh yeah I mean within yourself. It’s still a huge list of things you can control, or could theoretically control.

This is especially true now with AI and rapid tech progress.

Even our own death is now potentially within our control.

Play your cards right and you could realistically live to over 150.

So where do you draw the line of things you see as in your control and things you see as outside of control?

Seems to me there is not a single logical place to draw this line, and so this whole idea of ‘only controlling what you can’ is basically meaningless.

the whole ‘you should only worry about what you can control’ never sat well with me

with enough dedication you can control A LOT of things…

damn fine picture

similarly, people are much more likely to rally around ODELL than you or me

you can have a strong network that provides resilience without privacy

in fact too much privacy often goes against network resilience

try to lock up kylie jenner and see how people react

then try to lock up a random anon and noone will care

privacy is inherently fragile

strong network is antifragile

the latter is a much better investment

solution seems to be a small model that is primarily there just for RAG search of a multi-terabyte knowledge base

trading off gpu for storage, which is way cheaper

seems like this is what citadel chat is trying to do, just this could be taken to a bigger scale with a massive knowledge base

dope idea!

what would also be really nice is just some huge and organized info resource for sovereignty / survival / prepping that you can 1-click download and then use with whatever agent you want later

are there any such giga resources available?

seconds vs minutes

sounds like shitcoining