Can't believe that cost you over 19,000 Bitcoin!! 😂

What are these shaky assumptions exactly?

So let me get this straight: a group of people wanted to make a mempool policy change and got significant pushback. So they propose the "compromise" of a consensus change soft fork? Sounds more like an escalation than a compromise but I'd still hear out the proposed fork.

Where does node centralization fall on that list?

This specific argument aside, are you generally fine with contentious changes getting pushed through? It was my understanding that the burden of proof lies with the people advocating for a change. Why is it appropriate to be turning your back on the debate now?

I haven't heard a serious argument for why we need to remove the data carrier limit. Bitcoin is working perfectly fine for me.

Don't tread on my mempool

Great insight into the normie mind

I just came across this as Peter Ryan was interviewed on Breaking Points. He clearly demonstrates a lack of understanding of what Bitcoin is and how it works. He pushed the laughable FUD line of "how do we know the supply is fixed". I'd love to see Peter Ryan talk to a Bitcoiner