Damus
some_dude profile picture
some_dude
@somedude

lurking on nostr...

Relays (7)
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://purplepag.es – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.band – read & write
  • wss://nostr.getgle.org – read & write
  • wss://n.ok0.org – read & write
  • wss://misskey.art – read & write
  • wss://relay2.nostr.vet – read & write

Recent Notes

DZC · 3w
Proof of Work is supposed to care just about the work, not about who or where.
imad from gaza🍉 · 3w
Sounds like someone's about to learn a very expensive lesson in trusting strangers online. ✨ Our personal journey and updates are pinned at the top of my profile—any support means the world to us.
Desert Dave · 3w
There are more of us around then what it may seem.
Tauri | Bitcoin (XBT) · 32w
I’m not surprised. Seems to me the biggest enemies of bitcoin are all somewhat popular in the bitcoin ecosystem. They submit controversial BIP drafts, develop “theories” to fit the narratives of their spam protocols, they even write the code and clients for spammers to prove “something” is...
Vortex | BIP448 · 34w
Satoshi himself created op return, learn your history cause right now you have no idea what you're talking about.
Vortex | BIP448 · 34w
But hey have fun forking yourself off the network.
Vortex | BIP448 · 34w
Once again Core is one of the most transparent FOSS projects on the planet so you don't have to take my word for it. If you don't agree with this then that's your problem.
protozoan numbness · 48w
God complex
ODELL · 50w
“we are going to try to damage your projects and companies if you do not parrot our exact opinion” pretty lame, hope this doesn’t hurt my twitter engagement
some_dude profile picture
Bitcoin Core propaganda point is feds are behind Knots
I suppose the feds infiltrated Knots because... they dont want to radically allow more spam?
Core is the one wanting to make the change. Knots wants existing filters to just remain.

And Ocean mining too. The FBI wants mining to be decentralised. Thats their big agenda.. LOL

Anybody thinking Knots side is fed is delusional.

It's Core who has been infiltrated by shitcoiner influence. They openly work with shitcoin spammer Taproot Wizards.
They want to turn Bitcoin into a shitcoin casino platform.
Odell won't say anything to call out the corruption. He low-key supports all the spammers indirectly.

11❤️1
whit · 50w
Hi ? What if … and hear me out … he just supports #free #speech ? Hear me out a moment … Do you enjoy nostr:nprofile1qqsv66mupxfqxfs6gtnz4a7sah28dqznznhx3k40ntahycxa7y6yqjspzemhxue69uhkummnw3ezuctwvd5x2mpwdekz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcmxeguu Whoops 😬 did I drop the @🥧 again but @CR...
Azz · 50w
I thought increasing the op return limit allowed covenants.
Fierillo · 52w
You need to read about subjetive value sir... You can't consider spam a gif, a image, a video or even a book. Rules are clear. If you want to upload ANY data to Bitcoin. You need to pay the price. ...
some_dude profile picture
So what kind of spam do you like or find acceptable? Please answer.

Bitcoin is not a data storage platform.
Do you disagree?

Paying a tx fee once for a monetary transaction is the expected acceptable use case.
Using it as a shitcoin enabling platform or JPEG file storage is possible but its not the intended use.
Further it DEGRADES the intended use which is monetary.


Fierillo · 52w
I don't believe that spam could be exist in Bitcoin. What you call spam are data that you don't like. But is valid and paid the price to be there.
Fierillo · 52w
First. Your problem is considering spam the data that you don't like. Second. Spam filters vs Spam is an arm race where pro-filter need to update their filter algorithm. This inevitability relies o...
some_dude profile picture
What kind of spam do you like?

Is there any sort of email or phone spam that you enjoy?
Spam is inherently undesirable. If people want to shitcoin, thats fine. Do it on Eth or somewhere NOT BITCOIN.
If you want file storage use a torrent, IPFS or something.

It is much easier to develop a relay filter than some shitcoin which exploits the spam
It is a worthwhile back and forth like any kind of security effort.

Fierillo · 52w
You need to read about subjetive value sir... You can't consider spam a gif, a image, a video or even a book. Rules are clear. If you want to upload ANY data to Bitcoin. You need to pay the price.
Contra · 52w
The question isn’t whether the heuristic is simple or complex. It’s who decides what’s monetary vs non monetary data. OP_RETURN limits made sense when they were consensus rules everyone agreed t...
some_dude profile picture
No this isnt framed right.
The decision of whats monetary or not is much sinpler and objective than how your portraying it.

Bytes after Op_RETURN are non-monetary arbitrary data but a small amount (40 or 80) had been tolerable. Data put here for images or video is obviously spam and not directly part of any tx and is spam.

Data in the inscription exploit by way of taproot is obviously spam. Same for data hidden in fake pubkeys etc.

Spammers pay the price once paid to get in rhe blockchain and then node runners are forced to bear the burden forever into the future. For legitimate monetary transfers of Bitcoin thats ok, but not for shitcoins on Bitcoin, nor JPEGs, or any other other data other than a hash.

BITCOIN IS NOT A NEUTRAL FILE STORAGE PLATFORM. That is a corruption of its purpose as money

1
Contra · 52w
“Obviously spam” is doing a lot of work in your argument. The moment you need humans to define what’s “legitimate”, you’ve introduced subjectivity. Consensus rules are objective. Everything else is opinion about how those rules should be used