It's an analysis of past operations. If you add that the money raised is used for repression, surveillance, or anything else that harms the American people, I understand, but it's no longer a strictly economic cost as presented in the news report. In any case, the result remains the same: the tariffs are being paid by the American citizen, that has always been my point from the beginning

I think I understand you, however, the analysis is done on something already paid for, that is, a product that entered with a price X and was sold to the consumer… the expenses are calculated on that entire transaction; you can't pay more than 100%, it's strictly about the monetary costs of that transaction

Sometimes it's possible to negotiate with the foreign company to lower the price of the product a little in order not to lose market in the country... that's where that 10% comes from, which is understood as the cost of the tariff

In that case, recognizing the disastrous economic management of the dictatorship in Cuba and acknowledging that the situation is worse due to recent US measures are not mutually exclusive; it's just that he chose his side instead of being objective… or he lacks information on the matter and only reads propaganda exported by the Cuban government (which I would understand, the government controls the media and from the outside you can have a different perspective)

This is what bothered him, I don't know why

I see my post about Cuba bothers you. Do you want to talk about it and stop being offensive like a 3-year-old ???

I'm literally promoting something contrary