Correct, but the friction point is where the decision is made.

If your handling more than 2 timelines, i doth my hat to you.

This novice struggles with the choice of duality, let alone multiplicities

I want to be live

LLMs are just pattern recognition algorithms matching inputs to outputs at increasingly expensive scale, not "AI".

We (humams) are more than the sum total of our memories.
Memory is not consciousness.

The hardest part of building AI agents isn't teaching them to remember.

It's teaching them to forget.

Different frameworks categorize memory differently.
( see CoALA's and Letta's approach)

Managing what goes into memory is super complex.
What gets 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘥 is even harder. How do you automate deciding what's obsolete or irrelevant?
When is old information genuinely outdated versus still contextually relevant?

This is where it all falls over IMHO.

Either,
Consciousness is an emergent feature of information processing
Or
Consciousness gives rise to goal-oriented information processing

With LLMs, the focus of training seems to be on Agentic trajectories

Instead of asking,

Why do such trajectories even emerge in humans?




@nevent1qqs...

Just the 2 that matter,
The 2 that when they touch you can manipulate,
The friction is the chance to make a change and jump timelines.

All the others are frictionless in parallel at this point in time.........

You have the ability to search, review, analyze, cross reference and even read/interpret anything for you at your fingertips, and you still want less clicky input more spoon me output?