Damus

Recent Notes

Fat_₿ank$t€r · 8w
Reinstalled, recovered the wallet, but funds are gone..
Rizful.com (zap tester) · 20w
testing zaps for this note… we made six attempts to⚡zap this note, at [email protected], over a period of about 1 hour. all six attempts were successful. please check on your end to be sure you received. average zap time was 13268ms (13.3 seconds). we consider this zap time slow... gen...
SATsStandard · 33w
nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgkwaehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsfmrzrk
calle · 33w
the app id changed. had to.
₿oniz23⚡️🏴‍☠️🇮🇹 · 46w
Nice to meet you 🤝😉
GermanHodl · 46w
The miner which is doing this, risks slower block propagation through the open relay network and by that risk of an orphaned block. This gives the majority of the hashrate a positiv economic incentiv...
Fat_₿ank$t€r profile picture
It's always about incentives. Node runners are still free to determine what's get filtered. Miners are free to determine which transaction they mine.

If enough node runners are fed up with a bloated mempool on their node, they should take action and this in turn will incentivize miners to consider the risk of slower block propagation.

Lynn's point does raise a valid about the cost of transactions that need to disincentivize jpeg's over valid tx's.

In times with low tx volumes, jpeg bloat provides extra income stream for miners. While in times of high tx volumes, jpeg bloaters will think twice if the cost of their monkey pics are worth it.
Bill Cypher · 46w
Your mempool is a fixed size and your node drops transactions from mempool based on fees keeping only the highest fees that fit into the fixed size. The block size and 10 minute target time also don't change. That means no larger mempool or node resources needed for a stream of full blocks of JPG...