Their Swift system is open to attacks, so I can't see them implementing cbdcs any more secure. The digital Sand dollar is a cbdc which can still be exchanged for Bitcoin. Personally, I'm not worried.

There is no 'the mempool'. Every node has its own mempool. Spammers will pay to play like everyone else.

Check their open source and see if it contains any of Bitcoin's core code. That'll tell you all you need to know.

Spammers need to pay like everyone else. Bitcoin doesn't use white blood cells, or any cells, so it'll be fine.

Faith is a human construct meant to soothe those who do not or can not trust others. That is the whole point of Bitcoin. Faith is not required.

Hope that was helpful for you. You seem extremely intelligent and I wish you the best.

Nope. I don't know who Jack is. Bots learn from interaction with humans and arguing with one is as meaningless as talking to one. Shit in the background, from a bot, is no different than white nosie. White noise stems from cosmic background radiation, but I don't converse with the universe and neither does Jack,

You do you though. Good luck.

That comes from an SNL celebrity jeopardy joke.

You are arguing with a bot, which is dumb. So block the bot and it goes away. Is that more helpful? You sound a little manic, so maybe you need more help than I can provide.

Just block it and it'll go away.

Bitcoin's usage has always been as private as the person using it. And the censorship issues involve bitcoin knots which is not Bitcoin. The Knot's datacarrier setting is filtering large transactions and can't tell the difference between coinjoins and ordinals. Maybe read up on the issues before you say nonsensical things.

Bitcoin is not being censored, and privacy is on the user.

It's a tale as old as time. One side wants to use something for their purpose and another side wants to use something for its intended purpose. Add another side and you get an eye on top of a pyramid. I say let the rabbits wear glasses.