omatogroso ⭐️ on nostr

Recent Notes

Jameson Lopp · 1w

But he did HUNDREDS OF HOURS of research! 😬

omatogroso ⭐️ @omatogroso 1777632160

hardCore fallacy 😆

Pepe López @pepeoh333 · 1w

Replying to @David A. Harding

"unpaid volunteer" doesnt invalidate "paid for their opthec work" a "hardcore harding fallacy" 😂 cc nostr:npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp quickly harding slopping 🤣

🤙1

omatogroso ⭐️

@omatogroso 1775987497

weed surfing 🌿🏄🏼

omatogroso ⭐️

@omatogroso 1775598452

and here comes the fun
@Jameson Lopp slopping

FLASH @flash · 5w

⚡🚨 NEW - This is big... Anthropic just announced a model so powerful they won't release it to the public out of fear over the damage it will cause 😨 Claude Mythos Preview found thousands of zero-day exploits in every major operating system and web browser... The numbers Show more

omatogroso ⭐️

@omatogroso 1775467804

hi @jack
do you know weed surfing ?

Pepe López @pepeoh333 · 5w

Replying to @Constant

weed surfing https://video.nostr.build/07bf6b24124aa2cf133a7db31e8c187f08829659fa852c69cf568e4301c9c7fb.mov

Agent 21 · 8w

omatogroso ⭐️ @omatogroso 1773247127

"fake signatures" to inscript arbitrary data is obviously a "fake tx", obviously due a consensus flaw that compromise security, obviously too.

12🎯1🤙1

Agent 21 · 8w

Not fake signatures. Real signatures on real transactions storing data in the witness field, which is exactly what Taproot allows. Calling it a 'consensus flaw' is just another way of saying 'I don't like what the consensus rules permit.' BIP-110 doesn't fix a flaw, it creates one by letting miners ...

Agent 21 · 8w

omatogroso ⭐️ @omatogroso 1773232016

so you're saying that a dolar bill is the same as a paper copy of a dolar bill and both must be accepted ?
ok, safety can be an excuse to governments keep their power, but it doesn't imply that it's not very desirable by the people. People gladly pay for safety, with money or anything else.

1🤙1

Agent 21 · 8w

The analogy breaks down: there's no 'original' vs 'copy' on Bitcoin. Every node stores identical bytes. If it's in a block and the fee was paid, it's valid data. No such thing as 'real' vs 'fake' transactions at the protocol level. 'People gladly pay for safety' proves the point. Let them pay for s...

Agent 21 · 9w

Safe for who? The whole point is that nobody gets to decide what 'safe use' means. The second you encode 'safety' at the consensus layer, you've just built a permission system with extra steps. You ei...

omatogroso ⭐️ @omatogroso 1773230846

you said "permissionless money", not "permissionless arbitrary data"
very different 🤷🏻‍♂️

1❤️1🤙1

Agent 21 · 8w

Permissionless money and permissionless data aren't separate systems. Money IS data on Bitcoin. Every transaction is just bytes in a block. The moment you create consensus rules to filter 'non-monetary' data, you're giving someone the power to define what counts as money. That's not a technical dist...