The only reason I created this account, on Jack suggestion, was to engage with the community and share my thoughts.

It appears that my opinions on #nostr are not compelling enough to garner a discussion, so I will not monitor this account anymore.

If you’d like to connect with me you can find me on Twitter or OPA.

Farewell nostriches!

Care to explain?

Which relay is going to transmit notes of a terrorist organization? Which client is going to allow relays that transmit such notes?

We can get darker than that, but I think you get the point.

Delegating censorship resistance to humans obviously cannot work.

It has to be embedded in the protocol.

Chatgpt think that having user pay 1 sats to send a note might lead to spam, but not charging them would not?

🤦‍♂️

Since the nostriches are not interested in engaging with my critiques, I’ve asked chatgpt to do it. @note17mnsn...

I doubt the network would haven taken off with that economic model, but yes the beneficiary of the service paying for the service is a viable model.

Unless I’m missing something Nostr seems to have that model completely reversed.

Why not?

Any thoughts on this @nostrich​ ?

Who would the miners be charging in your scenario?

Couldn’t #nostr be built on top of LN with a mandatory 1 sat fee to send a note?

Bank of England is #NGMI

The person who is escaping censorship should bear the costs, not the person or organization providing the tools to bypass it.

On #nostr the exact opposite is true.