More power to you!

Another take is that the Core agenda was politically motivated to add members that weren't actually invested in the Bitcoin principles... and it's a bad look.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsgt72wu8erx5s54hc68qvjqjvfagxrkdr0favcjreka5g0hv4tgwqcrqkmt

There are reasons that powerful nations that have stood the test of time do not view and promote this segment of the population as "just normal" living.

silver will likely be used the most for easier transactions... gold being the store of value, silver being the medium of exchange.

The wisdom of the biblical answer.

And the public just can't figure out who is pushing this agenda... and the experts are baffled. Wait, is it every single time?

Nope. ;)

Exactly!

Also setup a lightning wallet for your nostr profile, and people will be able to zap you.

Not sure we needed another report discovering that shitcoins are shitcoins.... oh well.

Agreed.

I appreciate your take FTK, and wanted to follow up on your following sentence: "I like the intention/spirit of bip110 but I don't think it's the best way to achieve it (let the fee market decides)."

In the past, I have also taken the aantonop view that "judging spam" is not the way to go. But, my view has changed as Core appears to be meddling with the base layer protocol. Thus, what do you think about the increased OP_RETURN size that Core has implemented? We wouldn't be having this discussion if they hadn't taken action that has the potential to bloat the blockchain with non-transactional data. Thoughts?