Damus
Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
Andrew M. Bailey
@resistancemoney

I’m here to chew bubblegum and talk about bitcoin and I’m all out of bitcoin

Relays (20)
  • wss://nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://eden.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.com.au – read & write
  • wss://nostr.oxtr.dev – read & write
  • wss://nostr.mutinywallet.com – read & write
  • wss://atlas.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://Nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://bitcoinmaximalists.online – read & write
  • wss://nostr.fmt.wiz.biz – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.bg – read & write
  • wss://purplepag.es – read & write
  • wss://puravida.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://nostr.mom – read & write
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social – read & write
  • wss://filter.nostr.wine/npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424?broadcast=true – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social – read & write
  • wss://offchain.pub – read & write
  • wss://lightningrelay.com – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write

Recent Notes

Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
Austrian economics stans would do well to drop the victimhood over being ignored, and instead claim victory, because the best of that tradition — above all, its microeconomic insight — was so well-integrated into mainstream economics.

You don't get Alfred Marshall and supply and demand charts, or neoclassical price theory, without Carl Menger (both a marginalist and an Austrian) and the subjective theory of value. Price lies at the intersection of supply and demand — i.e., subjective valuations.

Price theory as we know it now doesn't ignore what the Austrians learned. Instead, it gives it all more rigorous foundations and expression using calculus.

And fergodssake, Hayek won a Nobel prize (shared), and remains one of the most widely quoted and cited economists, by economists, to this day.

Mises, I'll concede was "quietly buried".

Imagine an Aristotle scholar complaining that logic classes don't focus on categorical syllogisms anymore. Of course they don't; we can do all that and more, now, using Fregean and post-Fregean notation and mathematics. We see the superset now, and teach it first.
1❤️1
Neal · 2d
always refining bout to course correct the subjective theory of value 👀
OgFOMK ArTS · 1w
Not at all. It's an evolutionists estimate. The eruption of Mount Saint Helens in 1980s has fresh lava that shows "millions of years old" in carbon dating. The Biblical Genealogy is about 6,000 years old. Adam lived nearly a millennia at 930 he died. Following generations grew less and less old un...
dustygrooves · 1w
There was a cool thing I saw, someone found an 1800’s Bible, and it had the year of Adam and Eve / creation as 4004 bc.
Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
When did mankind fall?

Catholics: 500,000BC. Adam and Eve.
Chicago Conservatives: 1287. Birth of William of Ockham.
Constitutionalists: 1861. First Lincoln executive order.
Goldbugs: 1913. Federal Reserve Act.
Bitcoiners: 1971. Fiat money.

Me: 2009. Node.js.

(and the rest of the AJAX/websockets/React/html5 nexus — a stack that enabled live updating of webpages, which in turn meant you didn't need to refresh to get notifications. made social media what it is.)
8❤️2👌2😂1
OgFOMK ArTS · 1w
LoL 500,000 BC
Neal · 1w
“fall” is the operative word is it the type of fall one gets up from? by “nature” vs by “mishap”
Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
Agentic AI is all the rage. Here's how it's playing out, among those I know best:

- 7/10 are mucking about and experiencing a "gee wiz, tech is cool" moment
- 2/10 are less productive, stuck with increasingly messy codebases (or making their substacks/social-media-feeds worse by overproducing)
- 1/10 are boosting valuable productivity by an order of magnitude, sometimes in visible ways, but mostly hidden
3
Vitor Pamplona · 1w
Not all AIs are the same.
Laan Tungir · 1w
1/1000000 are designing their own. nostr:nevent1qqsvj230apzfq9gmsfmpupezdu4703u58u3aml9zdg70nf5tzrhgtccpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7q3qrmz9gu6de0m0u4ysrn39crrud099ahvfgs6pvasl4hpjr5ud7yusxpqqqqqqzv4z2sw
Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
There is no bigger red flag of charlatanism, for people in my line of work, than dropping a new take on unifying quantum and gravity. AI glazing is making this worse, because now the quacks can spit infinite technical slop for free, in addition to the usual metaphysical hokum.
2
Jack K · 1w
No answer will be grounded in the truth if it’s not grounded to the process Bitcoin formally instantiates. 🫡
Digital Gold · 1w
Well, everyone knows every atom is a tiny blackhole, therefore gravity! 😉
a source familiar with the matter · 1w
Virtually all of them but with special attention to Plato, Kant, and by extension virtually all modern Western philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism/ > In the f...
Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
I think Kant was out to lunch on that. So do lots of intellectuals I know, and read, and find most insightful. You might want to expand your reading habits, if it feels to you like “virtually all modern Western philosophy” follows Kant in this respect!
1
a source familiar with the matter · 1w
Thanks for the recommendations
Andrew M. Bailey profile picture
need a bitcoin shitpoast? I gotchu fam. want an actual argument? we have that too. thousands of bangers for your use and pleasure, all trained on Resistance Money and on tweets from yours truly:

resistance.money/tweets/
31❤️4🔥1
The Daniel 🖖 · 1w
I appreciate you vibecoding this app full of fire pleb slop content so we don’t even have to visit Xitter to enjoy it.
Bitty Cent · 1w
This is awesome. Average College Professor level tweet: “The ontological status of cryptographic proof is not merely a theoretical concern, but an empirical reality.” https://i.imgflip.com/allmtb.jpg
James · 1w
Just printed this bad boy: “A fit mind is one that can hold a paradox without instantly demanding a resolution”.
Maciek · 1w
ewww
Philipp · 1w
I recon one day she and her family will desperately need that math
a source familiar with the matter · 1w
Virtually all of them but with special attention to Plato, Kant, and by extension virtually all modern Western philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism/ > In the first edition (A) of the Critique of Pure Reason, published in 1781, Kant argues for a surprising set...