Michoe @Michoe 👀 npub1yryu2ucvfqqga9jpquvz9pk6kskt3j2rkrdfck2r3d2zwczn8urq0zv66anpub[email protected]nip05[email protected]lnurl Relays (3) wss://nos.lol/ – read & writewss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – writewss://nostr.mom/ – write
Aaron van Wirdum · 1w The testnet forkwar to determine PoW algo for Bitcoin-jr is more exciting than the BIP110 fork war itself was tbh. Michoe @Michoe 1786493940 Bitcoin-jr as in Bitcoin junior is actualy not a bad name.
Beerborn · 1w Nice! Now one where scales are either all linear or all log. For intellectual honesty, you know Michoe @Michoe 1786407525 I hope this is not log, else bitcoin is really screwed.https://studio.glassnode.com/charts/btc-utxo-set-growth?a=BTC 1
jb55 · 1w my node seems to be working just fine, weird. nostr:nevent1qqs0q7gedjjvx8wc8wrrxgp77fy9g6ckulzut8yqwgmyu6z7gak8kkgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxg6t5w3hjuur4vgq3gamnwvaz... Michoe @Michoe 1786404834 Not for long. 1🫂1
Derek Ross · 2w watching a psyop come to life is wild. https://blossom.primal.net/08eb2285df53e40be6d7bed5bc7ed11e049337b9a377b45e0a5539b83cbac809.png Michoe @Michoe 1786378780 Why do you think this discussion is so toxic?
Aaron van Wirdum · 2w Just in case the Bdashers’ wipeout argument does stick around: Bitcoin nodes can always reject the BIP110 chain even in the *extremely* unlikely scenario that it would overtake the Bitcoin chain at ... Michoe @Michoe 1786270266 Why are you so pro-spam? ❤️1👀1
y² = x³ + 7 · 2w I hope the BIP110cashjrs will grow some balls and won't come back to Bitcoin and use their new coin like Bcashers. Michoe @Michoe 1785869337 I can play that game too. I hope the corewhores enjoy their pedocoin. 1
Derek Ross · 23w just keep running bitcoin core 28 imo. neither camp is completely clean here. both the knots crowd and the core crowd are doing things i do not agree with. this one is going to take a while to figure ... Michoe @Michoe 1773156378 They are allways talking about them jews in WWII, but those germans weren't exacte saints either then.
ODELL · 26w > Where is the evidence of the goal to reorg thousands of transactions? Who said this? it is how the fork is designed and how luke talks about it Michoe @Michoe 1771786066 That's bs. CAT does that not BIP110. ❤️2
Geek · 26w While true, irrelevant. The risk of a chain split is not zero. The risk of csam on the chain is also not zero. The question is which is the bigger risk. I can see arguments for both. Michoe @Michoe 1771785655 It is relevant. Core created this problem. If they reverse their OP_RETURN policy, things will cool down. It's up to them. ❤️1
ODELL · 26w since bip110 has nowhere near consensus it will result in a chain split when they activate the main chain will have blocks mined significantly faster than the bip110 chain if miners switch to bip110... Michoe @Michoe 1771768541 Core started this! with their reckless OP_RETURN policy. This is on core. 2❤️12🚀1